From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the amlogic tree Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:22:49 -0500 Message-ID: <7hh8ku53ue.fsf@baylibre.com> References: <20180716080014.75c9016b@canb.auug.org.au> <7h4lgvm3go.fsf@baylibre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Olof Johansson's message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:57:19 -0700") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: ARM-SoC Maintainers , Carlo Caione , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Stephen Rothwell List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Olof Johansson writes: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Stephen Rothwell writes: >> >>> Commits >>> >>> 3f1ad8c53b29 ("ARM64: dts: meson: enable the saradc node in meson-gx-p23x-q20x.dtsi") >>> 4dabd157d48e ("ARM64: dts: meson-gx-p23x-q20x: move the wifi node to each board's .dts") >>> >>> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer. >> >> Oops. I missed these. >> >> Olof, these were just merged by you in my PR[1]. How do you want me to >> handle this? >> >> I could respin the PR, or just send another with them reverted then >> re-applied with signoff? >> >> Or, since these branches don't need to be static (yet), I suppose you >> could just edit the commits and add my signoff. >> >> I'm OK with any of the above, let me know your preferene. > > Hi, > > Fresh pull requests is probably easiest for all. I'll drop the one I brought in. > Ack, I'll resend. Thanks. Kevin