From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8878126AE8; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 18:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725215330; cv=none; b=WY+mZECbdraPU1my1eQ7ZTnYDKsMiJyhgl5KSRqVQkJei2akTH4wCNOQZZOVzuzaed817R8IliEHQWMMms4lUlm9LD2ijURwVq2vfcWMP/uX+TQx7Yg0pib45llayNLYRaQh+qe40Zdr1SXxPivix/JV8siGu7RIf0HTYxOfLdo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725215330; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0RYzoBOKEpaxfeWVQC5LQzV98V0L0r6EBX7krY/RrFY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YXW4UFq/XnZ8IbcJmREX5EsETaCpreYM/xPqIrLyV771NaI6fIi3g54tKJPvTadqd5zblnNFwkXbDLyKN4stD2B9IJNoVN6iq1KV68nECsdf3CjCx3ma6wp5ZjHGMG2Kwa/4Bcsj+in4jiNiVb8MIA2uNAjpPSUFcVAYxGp/DJ0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=wybkT605; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=68eVhT6f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="wybkT605"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="68eVhT6f" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1725215326; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RmY8bnVkd8XYMtbhSt4gVywEjTfDYFgtk9dXtbhAvZk=; b=wybkT605r846ulUgMAzCnC/xTrGTKYc/M0WWddUV+oIE6g+FHm/ErUNbiC1kRpwbPbeh3L y7tj9vw8V0J4i6rHaX7hHxPbLzN9Wf3RS4ZAZLcYt7/2rtSEK/hfypmb2eXaKI5Qh4+638 NQtpIaTiTWYd+5agFMB2Jdn7hdK3pwcU6AZCV+EoNBgzk3gt/UKa/Ps3NmrDhVvYjvd+Au dFlzxmRwvgXlCetlptMk30IbUeJALXdDYHgru9Jhk5gng+N8g+d1wYDk25eaW5+ckkIpJx r043qJhPJt0v+o1VyvbQYu1mLM8NuAWKPjWwRcnytSyle4fSD5/Ri1MrczTVkw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1725215326; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RmY8bnVkd8XYMtbhSt4gVywEjTfDYFgtk9dXtbhAvZk=; b=68eVhT6fQzvkt5SV/8OYt8KO7oGOnCwpCodHoIMV0E4ZtYGIfScJ/Ub9B0l3wQG/nODaNg dQENZ32qWXkK/pDA== To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Chen Yufan , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree In-Reply-To: <20240830160210.365b47d7@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20240826130137.631e5e31@canb.auug.org.au> <8734mremla.ffs@tglx> <20240827080925.32a7aec4@canb.auug.org.au> <20240830160210.365b47d7@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 20:28:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87a5gr8bz6.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, Aug 30 2024 at 16:02, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:09:25 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 10:04:49 +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 26 2024 at 13:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> > > kernel/time/timekeeping.c: In function 'timekeeping_check_update': >> > > include/linux/typecheck.h:12:25: error: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [-Werror] >> > > 12 | (void)(&__dummy == &__dummy2); \ >> > >> > Offending commit has been removed. >> >> That commit is still in the tip tree this morning. > > I am still reverting that commit. Hrmpf. This was pulled in via some other branch again. I've reverted it in that branch and merged that into master Thanks, tglx