From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB76A211704; Wed, 7 May 2025 06:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746600724; cv=none; b=bR/CVlNfV0UHqHW8CFi0eOVYJCTrG4zSt+ivXTJ0ACB5WI1FcbbxtF6sIn/pavNR/RhkrqArhZhY3M+KFJEamSp33QLr85mO3luSY3Tc/+oT4Z68Xgfjb46K9oKMRq5bYTV1smtcRCqyztyZgM7YLVf51tA/vH6p0leTu+GIvds= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746600724; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sAy+y3AZkIMDT5b/NnZgOmqXq0/LlciPRfUcFCB13O4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QzdchmwZH8vi6fAi7Zu8SZl4GvTb78silV46aGyolD0giXzvEWe97lN84NlHShXrX7ZrqG9QLhGXklKs9jGP1PjTVboKVrzD4FesHglpQHDlKg96YC59QGozAWrsJP2Agi7hAmgTe1fqq54vGs0yEoXXuGHEVnXy5ZvNZH+EPfI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=ebueA8Uy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="ebueA8Uy" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 88CFF41086 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1746600721; bh=Hosa0bzBf8nm3VLP5rpRIktgvVcUf1ib4g98bjlDpJU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ebueA8UyRiOTwAsisqFDLcOvUHpVBWL1CWp5eJlUGnLFcwIIgzFW3FrdbIq8bZ9UV VZ6MgN5s4iFMKjs5Z70f+IAbOHIv3c8+MzaBuPeSO06EDu6APmTT/IzQE7UdIKz7Ee luNYtTusagvnUwlHLgIul0wutObxOTmFCRjHn9s37bE4q9IMtKAKS0Z32HuUvTFYPO Do/9crejd8s6q0A0Vqh/5kv8VV368vIqCX6MPqx35+8yEf3THvJ1bqTrK80u6jP6tj ZKjoUg/9IcNaSqYZsYYWjmTkXwV3fH/EJCz3t4NCBp8jMh0FmGz0HsB01a/K9P9Xx1 kjNPuxQ46kojQ== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88CFF41086; Wed, 7 May 2025 06:52:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the jc_docs tree In-Reply-To: <20250507111956.69847ed6@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20250507111956.69847ed6@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 00:51:56 -0600 Message-ID: <87bjs4vroz.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi all, > > The following commit is also in the mm-unstable tree as a different commit > (but the same patch): > > 98d2ea56614b ("docs/mm/damon/design: Fix spelling mistake") > > This is commit > > 7368fcda3f61 ("docs/mm/damon/design: fix spelling mistake") > > in the mm-unstable tree. Yup, I'll soon drop mine. Thanks, jon