From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C537F1CCEE4; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 09:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725443895; cv=none; b=hQmg0yrbOuagFAIby77JXf4of/H1SfJPglSfVrR6kHuvmG8gPdD/5QcKIl+AXW4QJqOeJ8L4uEHRGpLFr0lX1HLAZA5W51ydWq8kbY3tKz0xPtX+2g8wWwPx2Xy1jPLaI84sekK1Su/P6+uSM+XDT+nZYOGHTPd2q8M7SFSB874= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725443895; c=relaxed/simple; bh=R3f8XqqhzUhpawC1aXctJCl08zl8Q7PA+O00jmQMEOQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JpGSLh5u4Y3jQ08nGpUcXrUvNxDjHA7nVTCW6C44je/aCE6rnZdYxxT9WZ+nMpdxQ4n5qkSOC9U+uKyU+3JKmWLgp7rqcESOGvRY+GshhVwHr002LQo2bqjqwvqfYuWPA6cB1t+LdGG/P1w1o85ft0AXOADFXyHn4v7cuRhd2dE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Ek1/+Prc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Ek1/+Prc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1725443893; x=1756979893; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=R3f8XqqhzUhpawC1aXctJCl08zl8Q7PA+O00jmQMEOQ=; b=Ek1/+Prcx1wIcIuMRTRUE7bbfX9+dbKIqJcsJicVJG1Hk+6nxlPb3tua HTZx6fLFhfIy2kMgmMBgO+FInHvKkBW0crIFUhp3e6qDro26YRhVn6ZfY cW/I6rU45FsHjPPgnaeYl1wlYQblWvCAagicHeZ9EIoj1HlnONdXdx2yF /+jE5jxG1+Gb+R/EFo5IpgKxQnCPx1xa3uVd0DuL976nzRhrJVg53Es41 YK3dqf9yuCuabmk7mY/fYRG6RCLsbw1JUFUofeuuJtWlWBDKBxVdstnDo pku7/PYgfc4LyWqnnTzax154hNkfyRdHdebQlqBkDrnXgAmlONSSsEShB A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: HgSW+JTFRuCTT1vO6G8t8Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vk11CzoUS5WjvVzIv9DDQA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11184"; a="24248096" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,201,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="24248096" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Sep 2024 02:58:13 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: oiYwld9UQAiVnRI/DkEpYg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: zHWxKB9sT2+xBNmaZkZy4Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,201,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="102626489" Received: from cpetruta-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.18]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Sep 2024 02:58:10 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Stephen Rothwell , Daniel Vetter Cc: Marc Gonzalez , Robert Foss , Intel Graphics , DRI , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree In-Reply-To: <20240904125206.6708daff@canb.auug.org.au> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20240904125206.6708daff@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 12:57:52 +0300 Message-ID: <87ikvbspun.fsf@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, 04 Sep 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c: In function 'tdp158_enable': > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c:31:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpiod_set_value_cansleep' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 31 | gpiod_set_value_cansleep(tdp158->enable, 1); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c: In function 'tdp158_probe': > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c:80:26: error: implicit declaration of function 'devm_gpiod_get_optional'; did you mean 'devm_regulator_get_optional'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 80 | tdp158->enable = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | devm_regulator_get_optional > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c:80:65: error: 'GPIOD_OUT_LOW' undeclared (first use in this function) > 80 | tdp158->enable = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c:80:65: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > Caused by commit > > a15710027afb ("drm/bridge: add support for TI TDP158") > > I have used the drm-misc tree from next-20240903 for today. Fixed by commit 532f0d109658 ("drm/bridge/tdp158: fix build failure") in drm-misc-next. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel