From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 374C518C31; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740753873; cv=none; b=SWzxVozcd5dTi/EVKkKYFyq62qBE9vAL7GI2ITtAN4tWtaYgeHWbjUs0ZdKMc9lRdwctdARm9e9SU+oLg5peLN+TRYWmn8bWw98+I00sw3OSy5Prx7OuLxlDwF53LJDcdxWwC7AgxBd7gWT+55R6xEE6RMSnd/Sbm+fuwAtBUYg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740753873; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sYyt7j+W7NXI/q6IXsYFDTRUuvsWwtgjn1zujNIuo98=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fkZeALQVwJb33q3rKI/cQcpua5TzK77TJrBOpFEztwbLvStx6egs45k5p5Msvo6YZJ8at6WYeaKpcuWWWCdLTHKle4Buy8/vxoFOvD14KKVXZBsR///37+feT0hPeg1eMBjrP68PQ4MAqzu7cE5vzGxrTva4Qc2+Lrv32dQoVXM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=EnuqdeUC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="EnuqdeUC" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 03987404E4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1740753871; bh=EA0Rr524KbYfrmQCryy1Nl43xYiTId+OeKrvkwYK2fM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=EnuqdeUCsIB9HgB+vj6QCQBfim/UNu5vpA6iyuMZvZKHKddXqIhjbyMvEf6trrNJq HmtGUPBbAC7G5ny594wu+JCmUAQ+1/QNGmEW8OcjR0YzjPDdJF4v1oBVHLefa2bfdR LqP3wJ9i0SaUMtNCaG1hapmnt1u34ugMwnGguUYta419Q+490X/5aLFyU0n1BqAc4U ydAd9y6Xz1+wedvG7f6V8YWrOjV+P+vCS62bhL9JKJDEs69Txtl0lwmMmiU0NzSK9j LICURgdJtTIZA6scTFG+QHn4LZ+yVQAKOvKiebD82uFgj/PaxJeTLaL/l8K7xCpGgA mZWBfDfHPY8pQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2d7f::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03987404E4; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:44:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Shiju Jose , Stephen Rothwell , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Tony Luck , Jonathan Cameron , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the edac tree In-Reply-To: <20250228103559.GAZ8GRj0xj6AKGVLj3@fat_crate.local> References: <20250228185102.15842f8b@canb.auug.org.au> <20250228103559.GAZ8GRj0xj6AKGVLj3@fat_crate.local> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 07:44:30 -0700 Message-ID: <87jz9ann75.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Borislav Petkov writes: > This branch is now public and immutable so you need to send real patches with > commit messages which fix things ontop. But before you do... > >> diff --git a/Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst b/Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst >> index b52ad5b969d4..ff4fe8c936c8 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/subsystem-apis.rst >> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ Other subsystems >> >> accounting/index >> cpu-freq/index >> + edac/index >> fpga/index >> i2c/index >> iio/index >> > >> >-- > > ... let's see what Jon says. > > Jon, ack? > > Is that the right place to put this in? That will solve the problem for now, though that file is kind of a dumping ground. I'll clearly have to get back to my project of better organizing the device docs... Thanks, jon