From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8CE1EBF; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 01:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709083030; cv=none; b=dPEYbbJb/txVGovfkiaCrYSkc3HzlLaAamXXphFS4RSKsF6vKKgzhN64CuXwBEEgfS1MdhqXfTuIoP4lHoAQ3h5DDjYkxgp5F9B/B4Omg6lJZDwjtu2KY/l27iu0O7lDwOJRam8Su60B7+Metf29myytzVff8Db/ZPPm7WHXT8M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709083030; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GlrWRft2zjOZR1DHUuRbrjc4zXkbHnkd4KRXZsq5PBI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jeGmuP5sgJbNS4tlykDpz/hjURLA6OfkJCt+Bp071LWzY2q1r46Qn9fdAg+L0nYX+OWd7x+o4q68DwY60MYxak3ar5ldi6CUGq8nMoe9UEIrOqwQdSbCuOFM3anRfN/9EpT+8PvnZariyEZlLLd6u2Iy3d0KdLf6fc+QV0o8rrI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=dJyOF1v6; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=sfyQEVc9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="dJyOF1v6"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="sfyQEVc9" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1709083026; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zDLJ5PCaooMP5sZjG8MJLQsp+tm97JokYiiAFtypwkQ=; b=dJyOF1v6zuD051FhXl7zkodB99ePkw0VfLJ5+oq2ql8DG3mPNLmAvfJqV/aXhH1iXi9vTI DiLSx8F26xZ/ZRSKVp5zV6Ig1zNCC/OTUqdIpHXd/kA41DxU/gnwQIACSh5TKTvPTAl1G9 VJFyB9DohwOUC2OEnW3/B6Be1pdcjIzVXotvQnkfNtu6+cRzpdLxcokXu82XPDzhqw+3BI UIB6T22Mdn2sVMeJVL1W9UGZBnQ4EJbKSHCgzSkDRf8DOZ29p6r6ObtJwynHPJbB9O4qGA yUY3s0VtO8AXKyzrDJIeyd92a0ha7sAtc2Q+P4mjAM0YxQzSpoDPWI6RXPY4Ww== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1709083026; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zDLJ5PCaooMP5sZjG8MJLQsp+tm97JokYiiAFtypwkQ=; b=sfyQEVc9bqgsvum0F30bZ3PD/r8OYLTGaGkiwzFH2VOwCHvnWxW8+iZx3HH0cKSECdILmd CHURrok4SW943xDg== To: Stephen Rothwell , "Paul E. McKenney" , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the rcu tree In-Reply-To: <20240228120610.0fdd20af@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20240228120610.0fdd20af@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 02:17:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87jzmp8k1a.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, Feb 28 2024 at 12:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > The following commit is also in the tip tree as a different commit > (but the same patch): > > 020eee167cca ("x86/nmi: Fix "in NMI handler" check") > > This is commit > > d54e56f31a34 ("x86/nmi: Fix the inverse "in NMI handler" check") > > in the tip tree. And why the heck is the RCU tree carrying x86 specific stuff which has absolutely nothing to do with RCU? Just because, right? Thanks, tglx