From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D793178CFD; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719339551; cv=none; b=o8MJDd6UkaBibDL0BkzxaijzvcsjalAlt9AdzOwNPFE6XIjAGtCvei4AXbfFasc1YKaN05dMw6v+7ongUP/h1jiSvVfz0ia4+aNcMavQhu8k4bMTmOnLaJekkssWX0w+0REbY37lq666k64ddhE8G3TLvetIz62nPHy8EsJj8WM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719339551; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sWfgKQAKWRN1bxsTLtOx+QXxi/EMIY4Oaiof9qYsDj0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VCBuUok1HWDV3gPypMIibkEwwNhe5oUnrrzhHF5MpWcaFylt3bTfvygbbOqUaLNbLtAWdHyuHf7apbTUJ5x9C/ugkhOoM903MNKZ01/chQWWw7QgySRqP6YWmZakv/w7dtaDnh85bpM6N2RCr89dnJ40ipPD0vVa6MwMlNq3CGc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=2xGHTXdx; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=h88RpE1v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="2xGHTXdx"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="h88RpE1v" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1719339548; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Izt7X2Ump6bqomeHDq6AkRm+hADEbBol4mL7qD9AqZ0=; b=2xGHTXdxgeoXUHdLMlEO57cOvI+tUUooyTIo2Jw/Taj486JxnbNnuh/hz2VPwBpwlvueH0 7m9wnX3LBv53F2lZmHasiSIgwr+c0roXW9epqjIk6Zx6XXORPEtMzP8IbWbbjEpysQYEjV EEt3erl+QOVfeuxa4qczlE8Io2RPKXzOhJActzZvMBVuEqweSvGHqADzOIntwHETpusw3h jZB3tCcV3GpugsowL8Njc7F+j5LhVuEzPBfhPbACQe9gnok0Dv6e0XloWFBnkissO47MHV 1ouOqCDm810r0qOzNlIsI/7/nNFtoDY23LnOHuoiHCNSflyknKA7ZLCbUsdbOA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1719339548; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Izt7X2Ump6bqomeHDq6AkRm+hADEbBol4mL7qD9AqZ0=; b=h88RpE1vSLOZFz383Iitr9GgfXBns0bFlLVV4VG+/b8EuPsMQkmRzLXTJkINOrMB0D9F6n HHpy9hzyE5Gu+pDw== To: Mark Brown , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Jisheng Zhang Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:19:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87sex051ib.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Jun 25 2024 at 15:42, Mark Brown wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > /tmp/next/build/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c:33:25: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'dw_apb_ictl_handle_irq' > 33 | static void __irq_entry dw_apb_ictl_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from /tmp/next/build/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c:15: > /tmp/next/build/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c: In function 'dw_apb_ictl_init': > /tmp/next/build/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c:206:32: error: 'dw_apb_ictl_handle_irq' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'dw_apb_ictl_init'? > 206 | set_handle_irq(dw_apb_ictl_handle_irq); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > /tmp/next/build/include/linux/irq.h:1331:23: note: in definition of macro 'set_handle_irq' > 1331 | (void)handle_irq; \ > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > /tmp/next/build/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c:206:32: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > 206 | set_handle_irq(dw_apb_ictl_handle_irq); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > /tmp/next/build/include/linux/irq.h:1331:23: note: in definition of macro 'set_handle_irq' > 1331 | (void)handle_irq; \ > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > > > Caused by commit > > 7cc4f309c933ec5d ("irqchip/dw-apb-ictl: Support building as module") > > (I think, I didn't specifically verify.) I have used the tree from > 20240624 instead. It comes from irq/core. It'll be gone tomorrow.