From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AAD812F5A5; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 13:33:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752845590; cv=none; b=VTfg2RyE38lDi7knEPUDXq+PB8Uv53jHSy8YPDrEJmvywB3Ilivl5UQNE8LebK59ckZWuWYVem0cWoalzHtPogseS/+q7wL/RRVgQ/Ct4y2owWmsgWaHomFWgqOtpqf/mbcB+j2Q1GokNRws205CSnzH9bINaRhGEDlIAnqgG9U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752845590; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4PfbEl1f3DHeAQCOZycNOuEWv+wGNquM1Kj2Mmlmhc8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MhierV0Do/UzIAVt3QzzCl0sOAb4Ilc/5/2w4/l8D3QrI+W+jhxHHwhaVQzhrYZGySWyA1UpjMQ2keFBTsWJu70twmX2NtqjUaaISZ+fRv378NlD3Ez9CXhMu6J3+sYafDw+xumUucrspe87GL3XdbROGw9RnoEDCaH3JxxnBIU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=OU/ZTkF5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="OU/ZTkF5" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 0872240AD0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1752845586; bh=G4lk4FsJ2qcAuacIqlErV7VdOaRptwqRW0ss5ksjS7Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=OU/ZTkF5ycQK173ADZPIZ28+TfFI7Hmfk4gGEKjBHw1YpcCAs9je4qrcDmthCMQfU zfOGX8jIuTMLhsTNh+mdxw+NewpZJG7/fNB38THdHD1pcdJyIZHTephEQo8xXqAPv/ 9O90tS6AUaotTPoB4dv7TAUjGUmS71y6Ixe2/mhGxKFZlWEbx6sKtS7n+pqGeQUbme 6a1QFeH7JMZZmRiOYsfWh47Rzf5q9qpNHSTD7lil++9di2mgQvJO2/lF8cXpmyAW8U m9fu4/T/GfVrioLuY3aVvCjL1LWx9/H8OpPtbdgZ5dtiyUxkd6Ir8/KVs7GbNRACJs 4ergiRourtU4A== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0872240AD0; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 13:33:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Stephen Rothwell , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pm tree In-Reply-To: <20250718132702.3d15eb51@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20250718132702.3d15eb51@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 07:33:05 -0600 Message-ID: <87tt398vzi.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi all, > > The following commit is also in the jc_docs tree as a different commit > (but the same patch): > > efbc5b4ac98e ("Documentation: amd-pstate:fix minimum performance state label error") > > This is commit > > 4613bf5fd045 ("Documentation: amd-pstate:fix minimum performance state label error") > > in the jc_docs tree. Ah, I hadn't realized it had been picked up there, I can drop my copy. Thanks, jon