From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFD04297120; Mon, 12 May 2025 19:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747076747; cv=none; b=nbp2kYuzYfr5wqON9tWN8QKLjMUHGWGBuv3Y96Pg/qB7zOSlk93egZRM98589qPeP/kD3prlMe0ZtU8qaI4lzh5fZ54cOpL3KEZpoZ6nfYbH1qeLfX/4ykecnBnyStQDhgHtAFv1oQcfNMJsVuIkNdzcKmCFvF+Mk/9f22/BJe0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747076747; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pFVpPTz6lSGVV0l8xYgVNStpIBr1ucdcf8t/1Bf+hqA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tTBCGW0VK85tKD2air+aWVPkod6noDEj9/7xC8rB3Ab31knML7cqsWOsZy3G7AV1QbV4d76vOX5EPFo7VSDCtF389SgGmB/j1n/i8zyEU5NiMoHAxE0Xd23rg/5c/xkw2Hs5/IEUU2oj93eeUmh2/c9y3I4HzE9wrGimeAqJOKY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=ZxtI6ytx; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=AzqX/2Cx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="ZxtI6ytx"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="AzqX/2Cx" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1747076744; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pFVpPTz6lSGVV0l8xYgVNStpIBr1ucdcf8t/1Bf+hqA=; b=ZxtI6ytxS/zZVj+/K5/V0KMYfYg0ilqSDVk13u6Eu2X2GN5kyAdAgw8zOnjgkuD65P8KHJ 2qslRe9eTN1NOUjOMrC+LHrZSwvNhhykxpgOZfrDW9ghg6DNV5zMzjnRv7EQXlIJT3dOX4 eXM/nWrZHjEZOkGqSRiR3wZyat5Dyi12O2PpZbY/wldHu1y2cEw21NyGnAztzFvnbX41c+ nuHOUctMRAmyT5gPEfAUKkuowV2xhIHoScqWReB+khh5HULoMt3YkjMPix9P+jzi9aayhW 6T4l3xCbiusS0sdTFpgRfEIUrHtUZ1rmN/Cc+vvqwhBn3fLMXmGZrD2Dz9aZWg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1747076744; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pFVpPTz6lSGVV0l8xYgVNStpIBr1ucdcf8t/1Bf+hqA=; b=AzqX/2CxbUKc5tGH3qJ0uCV8nEWURfM4ZS/rUMdqE3PtYqTlZxgvynUc/5kiVR7uykAWJc +j4pqgjspIBJm1DQ== To: Alexey Klimov , linux-next@vger.kernel.org Cc: peterz@infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Subject: Re: [linux-next regression] remoteproc seems to be broken In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 21:05:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87tt5pk5tk.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Sun, May 11 2025 at 02:09, Alexey Klimov wrote: > Hi, > > we started to observe regression on linux-next starting with next-20250508. > Neil bisected it and it pointed to: > 2ef2e13094c7510c40833951c2ec36cf8574331a > genirq/chip: Rework handle_nested_irq() > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250429065420.744042890@linutronix.de > >>No functional change. > > Manually reverting that commit resolved the problem for me. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=irq/core