From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v7sl7lrk.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6027e05e03474a87826217ee56f12761@huawei.com>
On Thu, 06 Mar 2025 09:56:32 +0000,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 5:46 AM
> > To: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>; Marc Zyngier
> > <maz@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>; Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Linux Next Mailing List <linux-
> > next@vger.kernel.org>
> > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:58:14: warning: no previous prototype
> > for 'kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > 58 | void __init kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init(void)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c: In function
> > 'kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init':
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:89:39: error: invalid application of
> > 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> > 89 | target = memblock_alloc(sizeof(*target) * max_cpus,
> > __alignof__(*target));
> > | ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:89:62: error: invalid application of
> > '__alignof__' to incomplete type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> > 89 | target = memblock_alloc(sizeof(*target) * max_cpus,
> > __alignof__(*target));
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:102:23: error: invalid use of undefined
> > type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> > 102 | target[i].midr = res.a1;
> > | ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:102:26: error: invalid use of undefined
> > type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> > 102 | target[i].midr = res.a1;
> > | ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:103:23: error: invalid use of undefined
> > type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> > 103 | target[i].revidr = res.a2;
> > | ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:103:26: error: invalid use of undefined
> > type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> > 103 | target[i].revidr = res.a2;
> > | ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:104:23: error: invalid use of undefined
> > type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> > 104 | target[i].aidr = res.a3;
> > | ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:104:26: error: invalid use of undefined
> > type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> > 104 | target[i].aidr = res.a3;
> > | ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:107:14: error: implicit declaration of
> > function 'cpu_errata_set_target_impl' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > 107 | if (!cpu_errata_set_target_impl(max_cpus, target)) {
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:116:37: error: invalid application of
> > 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> > 116 | memblock_free(target, sizeof(*target) * max_cpus);
> > | ^
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > 86edf6bdcf05 ("smccc/kvm_guest: Enable errata based on implementation
> > CPUs")
> >
> > I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20250305 for today.
>
> Thanks for reporting this.
>
> Hmm..kvm_guest.c gets build through HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY
> which is selected by ARM_GIC_V3.
>
> We could limit the kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init() to ARM64 to fix this
> like below as these hypercall is only supported for KVM/ARM64.
>
> Or is there a better way to handle this?
>
> Thanks,
> Shameer
>
> ---8---
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
> b/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
> index 2f03b582c298..5767aed25cdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ bool kvm_arm_hyp_service_available(u32 func_id)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_arm_hyp_service_available);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> void __init kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init(void)
> {
> int i;
> @@ -115,3 +116,4 @@ void __init kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init(void)
> mem_free:
> memblock_free(target, sizeof(*target) * max_cpus);
> }
> +#endif
Yeah, that's probably best for now.
Oliver, do you mind stashing this on top so that -next can build
again? We can revisit this and have a better solution down the line.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-06 5:46 linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-06 9:56 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2025-03-07 0:00 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2025-03-07 0:51 ` Oliver Upton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-23 15:28 Mark Brown
2025-09-23 16:02 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-23 16:44 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-24 2:37 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-09-24 7:45 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-29 4:22 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-29 18:05 ` Oliver Upton
2025-03-20 9:32 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-20 13:35 ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-22 11:03 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-22 11:11 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-22 11:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-22 13:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-02-22 13:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-02-22 14:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-22 18:58 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-05 1:31 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-05 1:53 ` Oliver Upton
2022-05-05 10:10 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-05 10:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-05 11:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-09-23 3:31 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-23 8:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-09-22 4:06 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-22 5:07 ` Eric Auger
2014-09-22 5:31 ` Eric Auger
[not found] ` <CAEDV+g+qVgG+=1Q7gBCPs8oAjK8rpzpoQ2cPMF0hi5Q1M3Nckw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-09-22 21:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-24 6:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-24 7:06 ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-24 10:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v7sl7lrk.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=cdall@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).