* linux-next: build failure after merge of the modules tree
@ 2015-06-25 6:54 Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-25 9:51 ` Dan Streetman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2015-06-25 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Dan Streetman
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2107 bytes --]
Hi Rusty,
After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig) failed like this:
kernel/params.c:628:6: error: redefinition of 'kernel_param_lock'
void kernel_param_lock(struct module *mod)
^
In file included from include/linux/module.h:18:0,
from kernel/params.c:21:
include/linux/moduleparam.h:246:20: note: previous definition of 'kernel_param_lock' was here
static inline void kernel_param_lock(struct module *mod)
^
kernel/params.c:633:6: error: redefinition of 'kernel_param_unlock'
void kernel_param_unlock(struct module *mod)
^
In file included from include/linux/module.h:18:0,
from kernel/params.c:21:
include/linux/moduleparam.h:249:20: note: previous definition of 'kernel_param_unlock' was here
static inline void kernel_param_unlock(struct module *mod)
^
Caused by commit b51d23e4e9fe ("module: add per-module param_lock").
This had not been tested with CONFIG_SYSFS not set.
I have added the following patch for today (which may not be complete,
but builds).
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:38:51 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] modules: clean up add per-module param_lock
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
include/linux/moduleparam.h | 9 ---------
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
index c12f2147c350..428d7c25c383 100644
--- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h
+++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
@@ -239,17 +239,8 @@ __check_old_set_param(int (*oldset)(const char *, struct kernel_param *))
return 0;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
extern void kernel_param_lock(struct module *mod);
extern void kernel_param_unlock(struct module *mod);
-#else
-static inline void kernel_param_lock(struct module *mod)
-{
-}
-static inline void kernel_param_unlock(struct module *mod)
-{
-}
-#endif
#ifndef MODULE
/**
--
2.1.4
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the modules tree 2015-06-25 6:54 linux-next: build failure after merge of the modules tree Stephen Rothwell @ 2015-06-25 9:51 ` Dan Streetman 2015-06-25 13:04 ` [PATCH] modules: elide param_lock if !CONFIG_SYSFS Dan Streetman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Dan Streetman @ 2015-06-25 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Rusty Russell, linux-next, linux-kernel On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > Hi Rusty, > > After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allnoconfig) failed like this: I promise I'll build with all[no|mod|yes]config next time! ;-) Thanks for catching this one too. > > kernel/params.c:628:6: error: redefinition of 'kernel_param_lock' > void kernel_param_lock(struct module *mod) > ^ > In file included from include/linux/module.h:18:0, > from kernel/params.c:21: > include/linux/moduleparam.h:246:20: note: previous definition of 'kernel_param_lock' was here > static inline void kernel_param_lock(struct module *mod) > ^ > kernel/params.c:633:6: error: redefinition of 'kernel_param_unlock' > void kernel_param_unlock(struct module *mod) > ^ > In file included from include/linux/module.h:18:0, > from kernel/params.c:21: > include/linux/moduleparam.h:249:20: note: previous definition of 'kernel_param_unlock' was here > static inline void kernel_param_unlock(struct module *mod) > ^ > > Caused by commit b51d23e4e9fe ("module: add per-module param_lock"). > This had not been tested with CONFIG_SYSFS not set. > > I have added the following patch for today (which may not be complete, > but builds). this is one way to handle it, but it will cause all modules to use the built-in param_lock, which (I don't think) is needed if there's no sysfs; another way would be to elide the param_lock entirely if !CONFIG_SYSFS. I'll send a patch for that. Rusty, is param locking needed if there is no sysfs? > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:38:51 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] modules: clean up add per-module param_lock > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > --- > include/linux/moduleparam.h | 9 --------- > 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h > index c12f2147c350..428d7c25c383 100644 > --- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h > +++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h > @@ -239,17 +239,8 @@ __check_old_set_param(int (*oldset)(const char *, struct kernel_param *)) > return 0; > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS > extern void kernel_param_lock(struct module *mod); > extern void kernel_param_unlock(struct module *mod); > -#else > -static inline void kernel_param_lock(struct module *mod) > -{ > -} > -static inline void kernel_param_unlock(struct module *mod) > -{ > -} > -#endif > > #ifndef MODULE > /** > -- > 2.1.4 > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] modules: elide param_lock if !CONFIG_SYSFS 2015-06-25 9:51 ` Dan Streetman @ 2015-06-25 13:04 ` Dan Streetman 2015-06-25 21:18 ` Rusty Russell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Dan Streetman @ 2015-06-25 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, Dan Streetman Only include the built-in and per-module param_lock, and corresponding lock/unlock functions, if sysfs is enabled. If there is no sysfs there is no need for locking kernel params. This fixes a build break when CONFIG_SYSFS is not enabled, introduced by commit b51d23e. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> --- include/linux/module.h | 2 ++ kernel/params.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h index 6ba0e87..46efa1c 100644 --- a/include/linux/module.h +++ b/include/linux/module.h @@ -240,7 +240,9 @@ struct module { unsigned int num_syms; /* Kernel parameters. */ +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS struct mutex param_lock; +#endif struct kernel_param *kp; unsigned int num_kp; diff --git a/kernel/params.c b/kernel/params.c index 9c955cd..d2c6a2a 100644 --- a/kernel/params.c +++ b/kernel/params.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/ctype.h> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS /* Protects all built-in parameters, modules use their own param_lock */ static DEFINE_MUTEX(param_lock); @@ -38,6 +39,17 @@ static inline struct mutex *__param_lock(struct module *mod) #endif } +static inline void __check_param_lock(struct module *mod) +{ + BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(__param_lock(mod))); +} +#else /* !CONFIG_SYSFS */ +/* we don't need any param lock if there's no sysfs */ +static inline void __check_param_lock(struct module *mod) +{ +} +#endif + /* This just allows us to keep track of which parameters are kmalloced. */ struct kmalloced_param { struct list_head list; @@ -465,7 +477,7 @@ static int param_array(struct module *mod, /* nul-terminate and parse */ save = val[len]; ((char *)val)[len] = '\0'; - BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(__param_lock(mod))); + __check_param_lock(mod); ret = set(val, &kp); if (ret != 0) @@ -502,7 +514,7 @@ static int param_array_get(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp) if (i) buffer[off++] = ','; p.arg = arr->elem + arr->elemsize * i; - BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(__param_lock(p.mod))); + __check_param_lock(p.mod); ret = arr->ops->get(buffer + off, &p); if (ret < 0) return ret; @@ -622,18 +634,17 @@ static ssize_t param_attr_store(struct module_attribute *mattr, #define __modinit __init #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS void kernel_param_lock(struct module *mod) { mutex_lock(__param_lock(mod)); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_param_lock); void kernel_param_unlock(struct module *mod) { mutex_unlock(__param_lock(mod)); } - -#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS -EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_param_lock); EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_param_unlock); /* -- 2.1.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] modules: elide param_lock if !CONFIG_SYSFS 2015-06-25 13:04 ` [PATCH] modules: elide param_lock if !CONFIG_SYSFS Dan Streetman @ 2015-06-25 21:18 ` Rusty Russell 2015-06-25 21:34 ` Dan Streetman 2015-06-25 22:39 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Rusty Russell @ 2015-06-25 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, Dan Streetman Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> writes: > Only include the built-in and per-module param_lock, and corresponding > lock/unlock functions, if sysfs is enabled. If there is no sysfs there > is no need for locking kernel params. > > This fixes a build break when CONFIG_SYSFS is not enabled, introduced > by commit b51d23e. This doesn't even come close to applying to my tree? I've fixed it like so, and tested it compiles both with and without SYSFS. Subject: param: fix module param locks when !CONFIG_SYSFS. As Dan Streetman points out, the entire point of locking for is to stop sysfs accesses, so they're elided entirely in the !SYSFS case. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h index abaecf1a63df..237bce382e32 100644 --- a/include/linux/module.h +++ b/include/linux/module.h @@ -240,7 +240,9 @@ struct module { unsigned int num_syms; /* Kernel parameters. */ +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS struct mutex param_lock; +#endif struct kernel_param *kp; unsigned int num_kp; diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c index 1dcf09f214fa..c19b2c50b317 100644 --- a/kernel/module.c +++ b/kernel/module.c @@ -1820,6 +1820,10 @@ static void mod_sysfs_fini(struct module *mod) mod_kobject_put(mod); } +static void init_param_lock(struct module *mod) +{ + mutex_init(&mod->param_lock); +} #else /* !CONFIG_SYSFS */ static int mod_sysfs_setup(struct module *mod, @@ -1842,6 +1846,9 @@ static void del_usage_links(struct module *mod) { } +static void init_param_lock(struct module *mod) +{ +} #endif /* CONFIG_SYSFS */ static void mod_sysfs_teardown(struct module *mod) @@ -3442,7 +3449,7 @@ static int load_module(struct load_info *info, const char __user *uargs, if (err) goto unlink_mod; - mutex_init(&mod->param_lock); + init_param_lock(mod); /* Now we've got everything in the final locations, we can * find optional sections. */ diff --git a/kernel/params.c b/kernel/params.c index 8890d0b8dffc..faa461c16f12 100644 --- a/kernel/params.c +++ b/kernel/params.c @@ -25,12 +25,22 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/ctype.h> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS /* Protects all built-in parameters, modules use their own param_lock */ static DEFINE_MUTEX(param_lock); /* Use the module's mutex, or if built-in use the built-in mutex */ #define KPARAM_MUTEX(mod) ((mod) ? &(mod)->param_lock : ¶m_lock) -#define KPARAM_IS_LOCKED(mod) mutex_is_locked(KPARAM_MUTEX(mod)) + +static inline void check_kparam_locked(struct module *mod) +{ + BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(KPARAM_MUTEX(mod))); +} +#else +static inline void check_kparam_locked(struct module *mod) +{ +} +#endif /* !CONFIG_SYSFS */ /* This just allows us to keep track of which parameters are kmalloced. */ struct kmalloced_param { @@ -459,7 +469,7 @@ static int param_array(struct module *mod, /* nul-terminate and parse */ save = val[len]; ((char *)val)[len] = '\0'; - BUG_ON(!KPARAM_IS_LOCKED(mod)); + check_kparam_locked(mod); ret = set(val, &kp); if (ret != 0) @@ -496,7 +506,7 @@ static int param_array_get(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp) if (i) buffer[off++] = ','; p.arg = arr->elem + arr->elemsize * i; - BUG_ON(!KPARAM_IS_LOCKED(p.mod)); + check_kparam_locked(p.mod); ret = arr->ops->get(buffer + off, &p); if (ret < 0) return ret; @@ -616,6 +626,7 @@ static ssize_t param_attr_store(struct module_attribute *mattr, #define __modinit __init #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS void kernel_param_lock(struct module *mod) { mutex_lock(KPARAM_MUTEX(mod)); @@ -626,7 +637,6 @@ void kernel_param_unlock(struct module *mod) mutex_unlock(KPARAM_MUTEX(mod)); } -#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_param_lock); EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_param_unlock); ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] modules: elide param_lock if !CONFIG_SYSFS 2015-06-25 21:18 ` Rusty Russell @ 2015-06-25 21:34 ` Dan Streetman 2015-06-27 0:21 ` Stephen Rothwell 2015-06-25 22:39 ` Stephen Rothwell 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Dan Streetman @ 2015-06-25 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> writes: >> Only include the built-in and per-module param_lock, and corresponding >> lock/unlock functions, if sysfs is enabled. If there is no sysfs there >> is no need for locking kernel params. >> >> This fixes a build break when CONFIG_SYSFS is not enabled, introduced >> by commit b51d23e. > > This doesn't even come close to applying to my tree? sorry, I had the !CONFIG_MODULES patch in my tree also, so this was on top of that one: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/24/550 I can resend that one, on top of this one, or you can fix it up. Sorry for not getting it right the first time ;-) > > I've fixed it like so, and tested it compiles both with and without > SYSFS. > > Subject: param: fix module param locks when !CONFIG_SYSFS. > > As Dan Streetman points out, the entire point of locking for is to > stop sysfs accesses, so they're elided entirely in the !SYSFS case. > > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > > diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h > index abaecf1a63df..237bce382e32 100644 > --- a/include/linux/module.h > +++ b/include/linux/module.h > @@ -240,7 +240,9 @@ struct module { > unsigned int num_syms; > > /* Kernel parameters. */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS > struct mutex param_lock; > +#endif > struct kernel_param *kp; > unsigned int num_kp; > > diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c > index 1dcf09f214fa..c19b2c50b317 100644 > --- a/kernel/module.c > +++ b/kernel/module.c > @@ -1820,6 +1820,10 @@ static void mod_sysfs_fini(struct module *mod) > mod_kobject_put(mod); > } > > +static void init_param_lock(struct module *mod) > +{ > + mutex_init(&mod->param_lock); > +} > #else /* !CONFIG_SYSFS */ > > static int mod_sysfs_setup(struct module *mod, > @@ -1842,6 +1846,9 @@ static void del_usage_links(struct module *mod) > { > } > > +static void init_param_lock(struct module *mod) > +{ > +} > #endif /* CONFIG_SYSFS */ > > static void mod_sysfs_teardown(struct module *mod) > @@ -3442,7 +3449,7 @@ static int load_module(struct load_info *info, const char __user *uargs, > if (err) > goto unlink_mod; > > - mutex_init(&mod->param_lock); > + init_param_lock(mod); oops, i missed fixing this up, when I tested with allnoconfig this wasn't built due to CONFIG_MODULES=n. I should have built only with syfs=n :( > > /* Now we've got everything in the final locations, we can > * find optional sections. */ > diff --git a/kernel/params.c b/kernel/params.c > index 8890d0b8dffc..faa461c16f12 100644 > --- a/kernel/params.c > +++ b/kernel/params.c > @@ -25,12 +25,22 @@ > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/ctype.h> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS > /* Protects all built-in parameters, modules use their own param_lock */ > static DEFINE_MUTEX(param_lock); > > /* Use the module's mutex, or if built-in use the built-in mutex */ > #define KPARAM_MUTEX(mod) ((mod) ? &(mod)->param_lock : ¶m_lock) > -#define KPARAM_IS_LOCKED(mod) mutex_is_locked(KPARAM_MUTEX(mod)) > + > +static inline void check_kparam_locked(struct module *mod) > +{ > + BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(KPARAM_MUTEX(mod))); > +} > +#else > +static inline void check_kparam_locked(struct module *mod) > +{ > +} > +#endif /* !CONFIG_SYSFS */ > > /* This just allows us to keep track of which parameters are kmalloced. */ > struct kmalloced_param { > @@ -459,7 +469,7 @@ static int param_array(struct module *mod, > /* nul-terminate and parse */ > save = val[len]; > ((char *)val)[len] = '\0'; > - BUG_ON(!KPARAM_IS_LOCKED(mod)); > + check_kparam_locked(mod); > ret = set(val, &kp); > > if (ret != 0) > @@ -496,7 +506,7 @@ static int param_array_get(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp) > if (i) > buffer[off++] = ','; > p.arg = arr->elem + arr->elemsize * i; > - BUG_ON(!KPARAM_IS_LOCKED(p.mod)); > + check_kparam_locked(p.mod); > ret = arr->ops->get(buffer + off, &p); > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > @@ -616,6 +626,7 @@ static ssize_t param_attr_store(struct module_attribute *mattr, > #define __modinit __init > #endif > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS > void kernel_param_lock(struct module *mod) > { > mutex_lock(KPARAM_MUTEX(mod)); > @@ -626,7 +637,6 @@ void kernel_param_unlock(struct module *mod) > mutex_unlock(KPARAM_MUTEX(mod)); > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS > EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_param_lock); > EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_param_unlock); > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] modules: elide param_lock if !CONFIG_SYSFS 2015-06-25 21:34 ` Dan Streetman @ 2015-06-27 0:21 ` Stephen Rothwell 2015-06-28 5:21 ` Rusty Russell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2015-06-27 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: Dan Streetman, linux-next, linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1776 bytes --] Hi Rusty, On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:34:31 -0400 Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > > Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> writes: > >> Only include the built-in and per-module param_lock, and corresponding > >> lock/unlock functions, if sysfs is enabled. If there is no sysfs there > >> is no need for locking kernel params. > >> > >> This fixes a build break when CONFIG_SYSFS is not enabled, introduced > >> by commit b51d23e. > > > > This doesn't even come close to applying to my tree? > > sorry, I had the !CONFIG_MODULES patch in my tree also, so this was on > top of that one: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/24/550 > > I can resend that one, on top of this one, or you can fix it up. > > Sorry for not getting it right the first time ;-) This is what I ended up applying to yesterday's linux-next: From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:19:19 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] modules: only use mod->param_lock if CONFIG_MODULES Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> --- kernel/params.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/params.c b/kernel/params.c index faa461c16f12..adc0bbc06cc5 100644 --- a/kernel/params.c +++ b/kernel/params.c @@ -30,7 +30,11 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(param_lock); /* Use the module's mutex, or if built-in use the built-in mutex */ +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES #define KPARAM_MUTEX(mod) ((mod) ? &(mod)->param_lock : ¶m_lock) +#else +#define KPARAM_MUTEX(mod) (¶m_lock) +#endif static inline void check_kparam_locked(struct module *mod) { -- 2.1.4 -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] modules: elide param_lock if !CONFIG_SYSFS 2015-06-27 0:21 ` Stephen Rothwell @ 2015-06-28 5:21 ` Rusty Russell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Rusty Russell @ 2015-06-28 5:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Dan Streetman, linux-next, linux-kernel Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes: > Hi Rusty, > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:34:31 -0400 Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: >> > Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> writes: >> >> Only include the built-in and per-module param_lock, and corresponding >> >> lock/unlock functions, if sysfs is enabled. If there is no sysfs there >> >> is no need for locking kernel params. >> >> >> >> This fixes a build break when CONFIG_SYSFS is not enabled, introduced >> >> by commit b51d23e. >> > >> > This doesn't even come close to applying to my tree? >> >> sorry, I had the !CONFIG_MODULES patch in my tree also, so this was on >> top of that one: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/24/550 >> >> I can resend that one, on top of this one, or you can fix it up. >> >> Sorry for not getting it right the first time ;-) > > This is what I ended up applying to yesterday's linux-next: Thanks, added correct description to previous patch and applied this on top. Sorry for the hassle, Rusty. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] modules: elide param_lock if !CONFIG_SYSFS 2015-06-25 21:18 ` Rusty Russell 2015-06-25 21:34 ` Dan Streetman @ 2015-06-25 22:39 ` Stephen Rothwell 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2015-06-25 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: Dan Streetman, linux-next, linux-kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1113 bytes --] Hi Rusty, On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 06:48:37 +0930 Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > > Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> writes: > > Only include the built-in and per-module param_lock, and corresponding > > lock/unlock functions, if sysfs is enabled. If there is no sysfs there > > is no need for locking kernel params. > > > > This fixes a build break when CONFIG_SYSFS is not enabled, introduced > > by commit b51d23e. > > This doesn't even come close to applying to my tree? That's because (as Dan noted) there was another fix patch in the tree he was fixing ... > I've fixed it like so, and tested it compiles both with and without > SYSFS. > > Subject: param: fix module param locks when !CONFIG_SYSFS. > > As Dan Streetman points out, the entire point of locking for is to > stop sysfs accesses, so they're elided entirely in the !SYSFS case. > > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Except the commit you added to the modules tree has no signed off by or commentary :-( -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-28 5:24 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-06-25 6:54 linux-next: build failure after merge of the modules tree Stephen Rothwell 2015-06-25 9:51 ` Dan Streetman 2015-06-25 13:04 ` [PATCH] modules: elide param_lock if !CONFIG_SYSFS Dan Streetman 2015-06-25 21:18 ` Rusty Russell 2015-06-25 21:34 ` Dan Streetman 2015-06-27 0:21 ` Stephen Rothwell 2015-06-28 5:21 ` Rusty Russell 2015-06-25 22:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).