From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB6DC4321E for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 16:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233827AbiLBQh1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 11:37:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59484 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233759AbiLBQhZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 11:37:25 -0500 Received: from mail1.systemli.org (mail1.systemli.org [IPv6:2a11:7980:3::36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 459D19E460; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 08:37:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8f4aa3af-004e-e479-9b75-2a01a97a6b76@systemli.org> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=systemli.org; s=default; t=1669999040; bh=nkBMNsdfmdehnVkOzVukiBB3XyA1WIc2UEileVdjQa0=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=c1mBjL+8rvPfCaBscfO3FnDSc7MUSTZLGvpx71DwfsDtVzk59EF1y7FVZYZ9ngWQP OVtM/dVTbqyoGTB7uLq5tnMfUwi4mET/IeO9nN9CmKX9Sod+uBGR6zEUApZQX/xLbk 06AbAAXKEqjY9r2a2r8+7gm0aEeedUWM/S+jp8xvZHKd013TxivBIBtM9l7zVTjZv0 clChHT06iG++ycyA0kYXKXsFD65Z4VC+TREeYxdiLfVfZmnIh1gtdOW8hrP06u+RZ/ ST4RKXTljsL3P6PsSMS9oYQE1vPS+vLU+grl0MuTYe64VXFj30oKPwdMuoaK7gPMAJ 8roykGap91Cxg== Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 17:37:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix compiling when CONFIG_GPIO_CDEV_V1 is not defined To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Kent Gibson , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20221202140454.273333-1-vincent@systemli.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Nick In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On 12/2/22 15:48, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Yeah, if Nick is fine with that, I'd like to squash it with the > offending commit or we'll break bisectability. Go for it. :)