linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Stevenson <david@avoncliff.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the char-misc tree
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 18:43:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUU_FYnF8Sgq6UGOqW3ug2cnwuNyaHiUNBCEpu3EvdA2Mw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201303011716.43148.arnd@arndb.de>

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Friday 01 March 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> I have seen a lot of such failures when using the Freetz (a small
>> router project) build-system with gcc-4.7-x where "-Os" is default
>> optimization-level.
>>
>> Last, when I tried to integrate ltrace GIT snapshots into Freetz.
>> All these "build-errors" could be solved in changing ltrace code.
>> So, I would not talk about "false positives".
>
> But the point is that we should not be changing the source code to
> unnecessary initializations, because that may hide real bugs if the
> code is modified in a way that relies on a sane value of some
> variable. They are false positives if the code is actually correct
> and does not need to be changed.
>
> I actually have a newer version of my patch (see below) that uses
> the cc-disable-warning macro in order to avoid some of the
> side-effects of setting an unknown option on older gcc versions.
>
>> Furthermore, "-Wno-maybe-uninitialized" gcc-option is available
>> gcc-4-7+, so your patch is incomplete.
>
> O don't understand. The patch avoids the warnings when building
> with gcc-4.7 or higher with -Os.
>

If the ...$(call cc-disable-warning...) line is checking $compiler for
$feature_is-available than I have misunderstood it.

Looks good, thanks.

- Sedat -

>         Arnd
>
>
> From d313219a2f2e0753b8e96105b7a944e1c22566ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:23:58 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized when building with -Os
>
> gcc-4.7 and higher add a lot of false positive warnings about
> potential uses of uninitialized warnings, but only when optimizing
> for size (-Os). This is the default when building allyesconfig,
> which turns on CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE.
>
> In order to avoid getting a lot of patches that initialize such
> variables and accidentally hide real errors along the way, let's
> just turn off this warning on the respective gcc versions
> when building with size optimizations. The -Wmaybe-uninitialized
> option was introduced in the same gcc version (4.7) that is now
> causing the false positives, so there is no effect on older compilers.
>
> A side effect is that when building with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
> we might now see /fewer/ warnings about possibly uninitialized
> warnings than with -O2, but that is still much better than seeing
> warnings known to be bogus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 473beb1..f0ec9bc 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ endif # $(dot-config)
>  all: vmlinux
>
>  ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -Os
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -Os $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
>  else
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -O2
>  endif

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-01 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-15  5:26 linux-next: build warning after merge of the char-misc tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-15 17:34 ` Greg KH
2013-02-15 18:07   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-15 20:05   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-01 15:51     ` Sedat Dilek
2013-03-01 17:16       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-01 17:43         ` Sedat Dilek [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-27  7:48 Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-31 19:35 ` Fabian Frederick
2015-04-03 14:05   ` Greg KH
2017-03-28  3:31 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-28  3:58 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-07-20  4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-20  5:13 ` Greg KH
2017-07-20 14:52   ` KY Srinivasan
2017-07-20  9:14 ` Greg KH
2017-12-12  3:39 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-12 11:49 ` Greg KH
2018-10-02  5:31 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-02  8:34 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-10-02  9:12 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-02  9:49 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-10-02  9:56   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-10-02 10:04     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-04-26  5:56 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-26  6:25 ` Greg KH
2019-04-26 14:30   ` Patrick Venture
2019-04-26 18:00     ` Patrick Venture
2020-05-01  6:28 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-01  6:55 ` Greg KH
2020-05-01 10:17   ` Rajan Vaja
2021-01-29  7:07 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-06 11:44 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-06 11:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-06 14:07 ` Greg KH
2021-04-06 14:13   ` Gustavo Pimentel
2021-04-06 14:15     ` Greg KH
2021-04-06 17:28       ` Gustavo Pimentel
2021-04-06 17:33         ` Greg KH
2021-05-24  6:19 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-15 11:43 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-15  5:22 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-15  7:21 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+icZUU_FYnF8Sgq6UGOqW3ug2cnwuNyaHiUNBCEpu3EvdA2Mw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=david@avoncliff.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).