From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Stevenson <david@avoncliff.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the char-misc tree
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 18:43:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUU_FYnF8Sgq6UGOqW3ug2cnwuNyaHiUNBCEpu3EvdA2Mw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201303011716.43148.arnd@arndb.de>
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Friday 01 March 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> I have seen a lot of such failures when using the Freetz (a small
>> router project) build-system with gcc-4.7-x where "-Os" is default
>> optimization-level.
>>
>> Last, when I tried to integrate ltrace GIT snapshots into Freetz.
>> All these "build-errors" could be solved in changing ltrace code.
>> So, I would not talk about "false positives".
>
> But the point is that we should not be changing the source code to
> unnecessary initializations, because that may hide real bugs if the
> code is modified in a way that relies on a sane value of some
> variable. They are false positives if the code is actually correct
> and does not need to be changed.
>
> I actually have a newer version of my patch (see below) that uses
> the cc-disable-warning macro in order to avoid some of the
> side-effects of setting an unknown option on older gcc versions.
>
>> Furthermore, "-Wno-maybe-uninitialized" gcc-option is available
>> gcc-4-7+, so your patch is incomplete.
>
> O don't understand. The patch avoids the warnings when building
> with gcc-4.7 or higher with -Os.
>
If the ...$(call cc-disable-warning...) line is checking $compiler for
$feature_is-available than I have misunderstood it.
Looks good, thanks.
- Sedat -
> Arnd
>
>
> From d313219a2f2e0753b8e96105b7a944e1c22566ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:23:58 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized when building with -Os
>
> gcc-4.7 and higher add a lot of false positive warnings about
> potential uses of uninitialized warnings, but only when optimizing
> for size (-Os). This is the default when building allyesconfig,
> which turns on CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE.
>
> In order to avoid getting a lot of patches that initialize such
> variables and accidentally hide real errors along the way, let's
> just turn off this warning on the respective gcc versions
> when building with size optimizations. The -Wmaybe-uninitialized
> option was introduced in the same gcc version (4.7) that is now
> causing the false positives, so there is no effect on older compilers.
>
> A side effect is that when building with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE,
> we might now see /fewer/ warnings about possibly uninitialized
> warnings than with -O2, but that is still much better than seeing
> warnings known to be bogus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 473beb1..f0ec9bc 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ endif # $(dot-config)
> all: vmlinux
>
> ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Os
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Os $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
> else
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2
> endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-01 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-15 5:26 linux-next: build warning after merge of the char-misc tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-15 17:34 ` Greg KH
2013-02-15 18:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-15 20:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-01 15:51 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-03-01 17:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-01 17:43 ` Sedat Dilek [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-27 7:48 Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-31 19:35 ` Fabian Frederick
2015-04-03 14:05 ` Greg KH
2017-03-28 3:31 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-28 3:58 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-07-20 4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-20 5:13 ` Greg KH
2017-07-20 14:52 ` KY Srinivasan
2017-07-20 9:14 ` Greg KH
2017-12-12 3:39 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-12 11:49 ` Greg KH
2018-10-02 5:31 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-02 8:34 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-10-02 9:12 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-02 9:49 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-10-02 9:56 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2018-10-02 10:04 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-04-26 5:56 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-26 6:25 ` Greg KH
2019-04-26 14:30 ` Patrick Venture
2019-04-26 18:00 ` Patrick Venture
2020-05-01 6:28 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-01 6:55 ` Greg KH
2020-05-01 10:17 ` Rajan Vaja
2021-01-29 7:07 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-06 11:44 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-06 11:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-06 14:07 ` Greg KH
2021-04-06 14:13 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2021-04-06 14:15 ` Greg KH
2021-04-06 17:28 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2021-04-06 17:33 ` Greg KH
2021-05-24 6:19 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-15 11:43 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-15 5:22 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-15 7:21 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+icZUU_FYnF8Sgq6UGOqW3ug2cnwuNyaHiUNBCEpu3EvdA2Mw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=david@avoncliff.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).