Re: linux-next: manual merge of the selinux tree with Linus' tree

[Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>]

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 5:48 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the selinux tree got a conflict in:
>
>   security/selinux/hooks.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   a20456aef80f ("selinux: fix typo in filesystem name")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
>   4ca54d3d3022 ("security: selinux: allow per-file labeling for bpffs")
>
> from the selinux tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Yes, I ran into the same problem this morning.  That is the correct
fix, thanks Stephen.

> diff --cc security/selinux/hooks.c
> index ae891d712800,44f6f4e20cba..000000000000
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@@ -698,7 -701,8 +701,8 @@@ static int selinux_set_mnt_opts(struct
>
>         if (!strcmp(sb->s_type->name, "debugfs") ||
>             !strcmp(sb->s_type->name, "tracefs") ||
>  -          !strcmp(sb->s_type->name, "binderfs") ||
>  +          !strcmp(sb->s_type->name, "binder") ||
> +           !strcmp(sb->s_type->name, "bpf") ||
>             !strcmp(sb->s_type->name, "pstore"))
>                 sbsec->flags |= SE_SBGENFS;
>

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com