linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:39:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhTg01RvbUAK6th6aYJuiyZFj4eoavHktyrsaEPfCuuJUA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170324131810.0b70ebbf@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a conflict in:
>
>   net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   613dbd95723a ("netfilter: x_tables: move hook state into xt_action_param structure")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
>   36fe46d172e5 ("audit: normalize NETFILTER_PKT")
>
> from the audit tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> P.S. You may want to consider a newer base for your tree ...

FWIW, the audit/next tree's base is old-ish for a reason; it is that
way out of awkwardness and not neglect.  Depending on how things go
today/this-weekend there are some audit patches in the queue which
will require a rebase to a much more current point in time (likely a
4.11-rcX tag, which presents its own challenges, but oh well).

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-24 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-24  2:18 linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-24  6:33 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-03-24 16:39 ` Paul Moore [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-08  1:31 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-08 17:15 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2019-04-08 20:30   ` Paul Moore
2017-01-19  2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2017-01-19  4:16 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-11-22  5:29 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-22 10:35 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-11-22 21:25   ` Paul Moore
2016-01-19  1:02 Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-19  2:48 ` Paul Moore
2015-11-19  1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-19 15:53 ` Paul Moore
2015-11-19 18:30   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-11-19 20:16     ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-06  2:55 Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-06 17:21 ` Paul Moore
2015-08-07  4:15 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-07  6:33 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-06-01  6:30 Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-01 15:59 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-01-20  4:04 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-20  4:04 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-20 15:45 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-20  4:03 Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-22  3:58 Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-16  4:02 Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-16 12:08 ` Eric Paris
2014-04-01  4:07 Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-01 12:54 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-04-01 13:11   ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-15  4:48 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-06  6:19 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHC9VhTg01RvbUAK6th6aYJuiyZFj4eoavHktyrsaEPfCuuJUA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).