linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
	 PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 07:47:52 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjSKCbbQHr7gm9G0z_hdjBSprCyMidi4LhYL7YECdRfqw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241106100234.189029a5@gandalf.local.home>

On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 at 05:02, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> This fix looks fine to me. How should we handle this when we send our pull
> requests to Linus? I may forgot about this issue, and it also matters who's
> tree goes first.

So just mention the issue in the pull request - preferably on both
sides. Particularly for something like this that won't show up as an
actual conflict, and that I won't catch in my build test because it's
ppc-specific, I'd really like both trees to note this, so that
regardless of ordering I'll be aware.

And hey, sometimes people forget, and we'll see this issue (again) in
mainline. It happens. Particularly with these kinds of semantic
conflicts that are so easy to miss.

I've seen this report, of course, but I will have lots of pull
requests the next merge window, so the likelihood of me forgetting
this detail is probably higher than the likelihood of individual
maintainers forgetting about it when they generate their one (or few)
pull request.

                  Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-06 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-06  3:04 linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-06 15:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-11-06 17:47   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2024-11-20 23:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-11  5:27 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-11 13:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-11-08  4:21 Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-08 14:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-11-08 15:09   ` Alice Ryhl
2024-11-08 20:35     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-11-08 21:05       ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-08 21:53         ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-09 11:09           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-11-09 11:55             ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-09 13:03               ` Steven Rostedt
2024-11-09 16:57                 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-10-10  2:46 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-10  3:13 ` Donglin Peng
2024-10-10 13:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-10-10 14:08   ` Donglin Peng
2024-10-10 15:04     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-10-10 15:58     ` Steven Rostedt
2023-10-23  2:30 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-23  3:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-10-23 13:41   ` Steven Rostedt
2023-10-26  1:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-26  1:21   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-12  0:31 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14  1:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14  1:04   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-14  2:16   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-14  2:58     ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14  3:02       ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14  3:25         ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-14  3:34           ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14  3:50             ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-14  5:12               ` Yinan Liu
2022-01-14  6:42               ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-10  8:08 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-10  8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-10 15:06   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-06-15  6:51     ` Mark-PK Tsai
2020-06-03  7:42 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-03 15:10 ` Tom Zanussi
2020-06-03 15:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-06-03 15:24   ` Tom Zanussi
2020-06-03 15:30     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-06-03 21:49       ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-21  7:32 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-21 10:50 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-11-21 14:20   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-21 14:23     ` Jiri Kosina
2014-11-21 14:27     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-21 12:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-01  2:47 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-01  3:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02  2:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02  3:42   ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-02  3:55     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02  4:17       ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-02  4:22         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02  4:55           ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wjSKCbbQHr7gm9G0z_hdjBSprCyMidi4LhYL7YECdRfqw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).