From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: fate of the kvmtool tree
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 09:47:34 +0300
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLFeVa6WCpr25t3hA3xGJb6rUgFqOLDrc5_3iLnUb-xTHw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20121003152921.c08e7019d2ada843888a2570@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:34297 "EHLO
	mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753033Ab2JCGrg (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 3 Oct 2012 02:47:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20121003152921.c08e7019d2ada843888a2570@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Well, here we are at another merge window and the kvmtool tree is still
> not merged.  So, is it likely that it will be merged in this merge
> window?  or the next?  If not, can I please remove it from linux-next
> (and have it removed from the auto-latest branch of the tip tree) as it
> just adds weight to the patches and the tree that people have to fetch to
> work with.

I have no idea how likely it is that it will be merged but I'm
planning to send a pull request for this merge cycle. ;-)

Btw, IIRC the KVM tool also ends up in linux-next via Ingo's tree so
dropping my tree might not be enough.

                        Pekka