* linux-next: fate of the kvmtool tree
@ 2012-10-03 5:29 Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-03 6:47 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-10-03 5:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Levin, Pekka Enberg
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra,
linux-next, LKML, Linus, Andrew Morton
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 580 bytes --]
Hi all,
Well, here we are at another merge window and the kvmtool tree is still
not merged. So, is it likely that it will be merged in this merge
window? or the next? If not, can I please remove it from linux-next
(and have it removed from the auto-latest branch of the tip tree) as it
just adds weight to the patches and the tree that people have to fetch to
work with.
It has been in linux-next since before v3.2 ...
224 files changed, 25539 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
1266 commits
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: fate of the kvmtool tree
2012-10-03 5:29 linux-next: fate of the kvmtool tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-10-03 6:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-10-03 8:22 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2012-10-03 6:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Sasha Levin, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
Peter Zijlstra, linux-next, LKML, Linus, Andrew Morton
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Well, here we are at another merge window and the kvmtool tree is still
> not merged. So, is it likely that it will be merged in this merge
> window? or the next? If not, can I please remove it from linux-next
> (and have it removed from the auto-latest branch of the tip tree) as it
> just adds weight to the patches and the tree that people have to fetch to
> work with.
I have no idea how likely it is that it will be merged but I'm
planning to send a pull request for this merge cycle. ;-)
Btw, IIRC the KVM tool also ends up in linux-next via Ingo's tree so
dropping my tree might not be enough.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: fate of the kvmtool tree
2012-10-03 6:47 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2012-10-03 8:22 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2012-10-03 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Sasha Levin, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar,
H. Peter Anvin, Peter Zijlstra, linux-next, LKML, Linus,
Andrew Morton
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 09:47 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Well, here we are at another merge window and the kvmtool tree is still
> > not merged. So, is it likely that it will be merged in this merge
> > window? or the next? If not, can I please remove it from linux-next
> > (and have it removed from the auto-latest branch of the tip tree) as it
> > just adds weight to the patches and the tree that people have to fetch to
> > work with.
>
> I have no idea how likely it is that it will be merged but I'm
> planning to send a pull request for this merge cycle. ;-)
Hi Pekka,
I just noticed kvmtool doesn't build for powerpc anymore, since 8074303
"remove global kvm object".
It'd be nice if it wasn't broken when it hit Linus' tree, I'll try and
get you a patch in the next day.
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-03 8:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-03 5:29 linux-next: fate of the kvmtool tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-03 6:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-10-03 8:22 ` Michael Ellerman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).