From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 4 Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 22:38:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20080704195529.7f56e768.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from nelson.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.133.66]:33023 "EHLO nelson.telenet-ops.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756385AbYGFUiz (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jul 2008 16:38:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080704195529.7f56e768.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell , Alan Cox Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > There are several outstanding build failures due to structural changes in > the ttydev tree (see http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next). Do we really want these (obviously unfinished) structural changes in the linux-next tree already? They keep on breaking several architectures since several days? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds