* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the i2c tree
2023-02-16 0:30 linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the i2c tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2023-02-16 19:48 ` Alain Volmat
2023-02-17 0:12 ` Mark Brown
2023-02-21 9:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-02-23 0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alain Volmat @ 2023-02-16 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Mark Brown, Wolfram Sang, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, Wolfram Sang
Hi,
sorry for the mistake. I should have made a serie with those
2 patches in order to avoid this conflict. Sorry about that.
I know now for a next case.
Cheers
Alain
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:30:35AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the spi tree got a conflict in:
>
> MAINTAINERS
>
> between commit:
>
> b3de755d6041 ("dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-st: convert to DT schema")
>
> from the i2c tree and commit:
>
> 7ec844a2c753 ("spi: spi-st-ssc: convert to DT schema")
>
> from the spi tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc MAINTAINERS
> index 71e92d3c51c6,daa33e7bb457..000000000000
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@@ -2791,7 -2925,8 +2791,8 @@@ M: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@fos
> L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> S: Maintained
> W: http://www.stlinux.com
> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/st,ssc-spi.yaml
> -F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-st.txt
> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,sti-i2c.yaml
> F: arch/arm/boot/dts/sti*
> F: arch/arm/mach-sti/
> F: drivers/ata/ahci_st.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the i2c tree
2023-02-16 19:48 ` Alain Volmat
@ 2023-02-17 0:12 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2023-02-17 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell, Wolfram Sang, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, Wolfram Sang
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 364 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 08:48:02PM +0100, Alain Volmat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for the mistake. I should have made a serie with those
> 2 patches in order to avoid this conflict. Sorry about that.
> I know now for a next case.
This sort of trivial add/add change is generally not a problem,
it's just good for the people sending the trees to be aware.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the i2c tree
2023-02-16 0:30 linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the i2c tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-16 19:48 ` Alain Volmat
@ 2023-02-21 9:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-02-21 16:57 ` Alain Volmat
2023-02-23 0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2023-02-21 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Mark Brown, Wolfram Sang, Alain Volmat, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, Wolfram Sang
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 1:37 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the spi tree got a conflict in:
>
> MAINTAINERS
>
> between commit:
>
> b3de755d6041 ("dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-st: convert to DT schema")
>
> from the i2c tree and commit:
>
> 7ec844a2c753 ("spi: spi-st-ssc: convert to DT schema")
>
> from the spi tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc MAINTAINERS
> index 71e92d3c51c6,daa33e7bb457..000000000000
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@@ -2791,7 -2925,8 +2791,8 @@@ M: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@fos
> L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> S: Maintained
> W: http://www.stlinux.com
> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/st,ssc-spi.yaml
> -F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-st.txt
> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,sti-i2c.yaml
> F: arch/arm/boot/dts/sti*
> F: arch/arm/mach-sti/
> F: drivers/ata/ahci_st.c
Thanks, but please preserve sort order.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the i2c tree
2023-02-21 9:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2023-02-21 16:57 ` Alain Volmat
2023-02-21 17:04 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alain Volmat @ 2023-02-21 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown, Wolfram Sang
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Geert Uytterhoeven, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, Wolfram Sang
Hi Mark, Wolfram,
should I update something to avoid this conflict before you push the
pull request for v6.3 ?
Cheers,
Alain
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:11:03AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 1:37 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the spi tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > MAINTAINERS
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > b3de755d6041 ("dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-st: convert to DT schema")
> >
> > from the i2c tree and commit:
> >
> > 7ec844a2c753 ("spi: spi-st-ssc: convert to DT schema")
> >
> > from the spi tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> > diff --cc MAINTAINERS
> > index 71e92d3c51c6,daa33e7bb457..000000000000
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@@ -2791,7 -2925,8 +2791,8 @@@ M: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@fos
> > L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> > S: Maintained
> > W: http://www.stlinux.com
> > + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/st,ssc-spi.yaml
> > -F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-st.txt
> > +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,sti-i2c.yaml
> > F: arch/arm/boot/dts/sti*
> > F: arch/arm/mach-sti/
> > F: drivers/ata/ahci_st.c
>
> Thanks, but please preserve sort order.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the i2c tree
2023-02-21 16:57 ` Alain Volmat
@ 2023-02-21 17:04 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2023-02-21 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang, Stephen Rothwell, Geert Uytterhoeven,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List, Wolfram Sang
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 417 bytes --]
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 05:57:41PM +0100, Alain Volmat wrote:
> should I update something to avoid this conflict before you push the
> pull request for v6.3 ?
No, it's fine.
Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows
readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
discussion is being addressed.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the i2c tree
2023-02-16 0:30 linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the i2c tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-16 19:48 ` Alain Volmat
2023-02-21 9:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2023-02-23 0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2023-02-23 0:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang
Cc: Mark Brown, Alain Volmat, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, Wolfram Sang
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1489 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:30:35 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the spi tree got a conflict in:
>
> MAINTAINERS
>
> between commit:
>
> b3de755d6041 ("dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-st: convert to DT schema")
>
> from the i2c tree and commit:
>
> 7ec844a2c753 ("spi: spi-st-ssc: convert to DT schema")
>
> from the spi tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
>
> diff --cc MAINTAINERS
> index 71e92d3c51c6,daa33e7bb457..000000000000
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@@ -2791,7 -2925,8 +2791,8 @@@ M: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@fos
> L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> S: Maintained
> W: http://www.stlinux.com
> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/st,ssc-spi.yaml
> -F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-st.txt
> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,sti-i2c.yaml
> F: arch/arm/boot/dts/sti*
> F: arch/arm/mach-sti/
> F: drivers/ata/ahci_st.c
This is now a conflict between the i2c tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread