public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the bitmap tree
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 18:22:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+RYyblnIL0Zrrwj@yury-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230209130224.76c7f357@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 01:02:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commits are also in the net-next tree as different commits
> (but the same patches):
> 
>   2386459394d2 ("lib/cpumask: update comment for cpumask_local_spread()")
>   a99b18849bc8 ("net/mlx5e: Improve remote NUMA preferences used for the IRQ affinity hints")
>   af547a927f9f ("sched/topology: Introduce for_each_numa_hop_mask()")
>   439829e1bfba ("sched/topology: Introduce sched_numa_hop_mask()")
>   c0d13fba970d ("lib/cpumask: reorganize cpumask_local_spread() logic")
>   8ec0ffa233ab ("cpumask: improve on cpumask_local_spread() locality")
>   6139966175ca ("sched: add sched_numa_find_nth_cpu()")
>   ded3cee7db80 ("cpumask: introduce cpumask_nth_and_andnot")
> 
> These are commits
> 
>   2ac4980c57f5 ("lib/cpumask: update comment for cpumask_local_spread()")
>   2acda57736de ("net/mlx5e: Improve remote NUMA preferences used for the IRQ affinity hints")
>   06ac01721f7d ("sched/topology: Introduce for_each_numa_hop_mask()")
>   9feae65845f7 ("sched/topology: Introduce sched_numa_hop_mask()")
>   b1beed72b8b7 ("lib/cpumask: reorganize cpumask_local_spread() logic")
>   406d394abfcd ("cpumask: improve on cpumask_local_spread() locality")
>   cd7f55359c90 ("sched: add sched_numa_find_nth_cpu()")
>   62f4386e564d ("cpumask: introduce cpumask_nth_and_andnot")
> 
> in the net-next tree.
> 
> There are some slight differences (I got a conflict merging the bitmap
> tree today), but the net-next series is newer than the bitmap tree one ...

I removed those from bitmap-for-next. Let's move with net-next.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-09  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-09  2:02 linux-next: duplicate patches in the bitmap tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-09  2:22 ` Yury Norov [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-08 23:08 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-08 23:13 ` Yury Norov
2025-08-01  1:27 Stephen Rothwell
2025-08-01 12:30 ` Yury Norov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y+RYyblnIL0Zrrwj@yury-laptop \
    --to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox