Linux-Next discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Intel Graphics" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"José Expósito" <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <maxime@cerno.tech>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the origin tree
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 10:29:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3ZvffZiR+SgtY6h@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116105702.746ce3cf@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:57:02AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   682f99b8ae88 ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Take our lock to reset the link")
> 
> from the origin tree and commits:
> 
>   d218750805a3 ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Pass vc4_hdmi to vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling()")
>   0a99962c0dbf ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Fix pointer dereference before check")
> 
> from the drm-misc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> index d7fcc7a4c082,6b223a5fcf6f..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> @@@ -349,12 -348,9 +348,13 @@@ static int vc4_hdmi_reset_link(struct d
>   	if (!crtc_state->active)
>   		return 0;
>   
>  +	mutex_lock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
>  +
> - 	if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(encoder)) {
> + 	vc4_hdmi = connector_to_vc4_hdmi(connector);
>  -	if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(vc4_hdmi))
> ++	if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(vc4_hdmi)) {
>  +		mutex_unlock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
>   		return 0;
>  +	}
>   
>   	scrambling_needed = vc4_hdmi_mode_needs_scrambling(&vc4_hdmi->saved_adjusted_mode,
>   							   vc4_hdmi->output_bpc,

This resolution is not quite right, as pointed out by clang:

    drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c:351:14: error: variable 'vc4_hdmi' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
            mutex_lock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
                        ^~~~~~~~
    ./include/linux/mutex.h:187:44: note: expanded from macro 'mutex_lock'
    #define mutex_lock(lock) mutex_lock_nested(lock, 0)
                                               ^~~~
    drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c:322:27: note: initialize the variable 'vc4_hdmi' to silence this warning
            struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi;
                                     ^
                                      = NULL
    1 error generated.

Obviously, the assignment of vc4_hdmi should be before mutex_lock().

Cheers,
Nathan

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-17 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-15 23:57 linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the origin tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-17 17:29 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2022-11-17 22:06   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-18  0:01     ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-18  9:20       ` Maxime Ripard
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-16  4:23 Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-07 22:31 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y3ZvffZiR+SgtY6h@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.exposito89@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox