From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531FFC433DB for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C6F64E74 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230227AbhBLQTP (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:19:15 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33216 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230235AbhBLQTK (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:19:10 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59FB4C0613D6; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:18:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=TkUYN4LQxgT7TupyOOW/SgGGTc0FM1qxqUxoeeSOi1M=; b=vullsWgJEc/y4AmHD9ghPW37Lw 4+XLREW85+Mr1uasvjCKS1AW1nSVTyPsyyC79SxFu+i84FU8PT+DjyDcvjJTaz81FhxmV3aIoqSq3 A66DRVpAUxDgpeM2i/Vtgo1b08XiowKYawrWYgPvGlasdEN1ADoEz7SGsUWfiAt2jPjbv/gb3t0pO Jty5Z9sxFSRALP5rrfwSeXv1H6YeLIS9BGu4157y4hPGs9i7k9d1V26R0dkoioAlYPCuXLK7j/Eyc 1rM4h0ZZnEw0KvQBGncbRkzOvwqv7Tf5AQQCDyUnfWYKRutbtt8xxF8oPqZLdprs4rTmQc8NPYRTR znid5lkg==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lAb98-00Bp5W-W5; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:18:19 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9CE300446; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:18:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 375A72C1D2C05; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:18:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:18:18 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Jens Axboe Cc: paulmck@kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , Frederic Weisbecker , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the block tree Message-ID: References: <20210211164852.7489b87d@canb.auug.org.au> <20210211173802.GM2743@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 08:26:56AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > But I think I made a mistake in that it should've been sched/smp instead, > which would likely get rid of this issue too? I'll rebase it, it's just > a single topic branch with just those two patches on top. Right, I made tip/sched/smp with just that one patch. That _should_ work for you, if not, please let me know.