From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83BEC433E0 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A079C64F8A for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231139AbhCJJwv (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 04:52:51 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60550 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232292AbhCJJwZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 04:52:25 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1615369943; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BzpWVQgMrjdLxjzqjLNOJBINgLByL8FbMn1TCm9MLpU=; b=uNVIyVuu1EaOJBxUk/vvyC9SQJqBYq8n5Q4IYKCX/29tT8VWk0KekZAnzqVhHpQFDf+/ae iLmYr86ilvyT67s4mahVc/Cz7An3vqdQWQE30aWbSJCYuyI74IzkMt03p5F9gN90PCMT5a 1tjIL7aSVtwdJjvt73GrwMsChVOsPBc= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3E0AE42; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:52:23 +0100 From: Petr Mladek To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Yafang Shao Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 10 (lib/test_printf.c) Message-ID: References: <20210310150217.046fef19@canb.auug.org.au> <62857b03-c12c-6841-72ae-d94f00a3a868@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <62857b03-c12c-6841-72ae-d94f00a3a868@infradead.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Tue 2021-03-09 21:57:48, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 3/9/21 8:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > on i386 (at least): > > ../lib/test_printf.c: In function 'page_flags_test': > ../lib/test_printf.c:595:17: error: 'sec' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'sem'? > page_flags |= (sec & SECTIONS_MASK) << SECTIONS_PGSHIFT; > ^~~ > > > Should that be 'section'? Yup, it looks like. There seems to be one more problem found by the test robot: lib/test_printf.c:595:17: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in >> lib/test_printf.c:612:17: error: 'tag' undeclared (first use in this function) 612 | page_flags |= (tag & KASAN_TAG_MASK) << KASAN_TAG_PGSHIFT; Yafang is going to send a fix. I have temporary removed the problematic patch from printk/linux.git, for-next branch. I am sorry for the troubles. Anyway, it is great that linux-next and all the test robots are around. Best Regards, Petr