From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the random tree with the jc_docs tree
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 23:32:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmJMBnBV8wO4aco9@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220422135927.7fa82fa4@canb.auug.org.au>
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 01:59:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the random tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/security/siphash.rst
>
> between commits:
>
> dc701cfc5b26 ("Documentation: siphash: convert danger note to warning for HalfSipHash")
> 561fb3cd5ec2 ("Documentation: siphash: enclose HalfSipHash usage example in the literal block")
>
> from the jc_docs tree and commit:
>
> 91afe794c070 ("siphash: update the hsiphash documentation")
>
> from the random tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc Documentation/security/siphash.rst
> index 06d793e68086,79ac8101406c..000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/security/siphash.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/security/siphash.rst
> @@@ -121,15 -121,23 +121,25 @@@ even scarier, uses an easily brute-forc
> instead of SipHash's 128-bit key. However, this may appeal to some
> high-performance `jhash` users.
>
> + HalfSipHash support is provided through the "hsiphash" family of functions.
> +
> -**Danger!** Do not ever use the hsiphash functions except for as a hashtable key
> -function, and only then when you can be absolutely certain that the outputs will
> -never be transmitted out of the kernel. This is only remotely useful over
> -`jhash` as a means of mitigating hashtable flooding denial of service attacks.
> +.. warning::
> + Do not ever use HalfSipHash except for as a hashtable key function, and
> + only then when you can be absolutely certain that the outputs will never
> + be transmitted out of the kernel. This is only remotely useful over
> + `jhash` as a means of mitigating hashtable flooding denial of service
> + attacks.
That's not exactly the correct resolution, since it dropped the change to the
text of this paragraph that my patch made ("HalfSipHash" => "the hsiphash
functions").
We should get the updates to this file to go through one tree. Jason, probably
you'd want it to be yours?
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-22 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-22 3:59 linux-next: manual merge of the random tree with the jc_docs tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-22 6:32 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-04-22 7:21 ` Jonathan Corbet
2022-04-22 9:02 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-04-22 9:16 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-04-22 15:49 ` Jonathan Corbet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YmJMBnBV8wO4aco9@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox