From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the risc-v-mc tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 07:29:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YylduXa12mtakuHT@wendy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220920051905.500a52ce@canb.auug.org.au>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 05:19:05AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the risc-v-mc tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi
>
> between commits:
>
> 3f67e6997603 ("riscv: dts: microchip: mpfs: fix incorrect pcie child node name")
> e4009c5fa77b ("riscv: dts: microchip: mpfs: remove pci axi address translation property")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 2ad0883d86c8 ("riscv: dts: microchip: move the mpfs' pci node to -fabric.dtsi")
>
> from the risc-v-mc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter change seems to include the other 2) and can
Yup, I test merged it after applying and that was my resolution too.
Thanks Stephen.
> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-20 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-19 19:19 linux-next: manual merge of the risc-v-mc tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-20 6:29 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YylduXa12mtakuHT@wendy \
--to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).