public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rust tree
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:59:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-FJH628-j2HCuaE@cassiopeiae> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250324220629.1665236b@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi Stephen,

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:06:29PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 21:57:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the rust tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > error[E0277]: `*mut MyStruct` cannot be sent between threads safely
> >   --> samples/rust/rust_dma.rs:47:22  
> >    |
> > 47 | impl pci::Driver for DmaSampleDriver {
> >    |                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `*mut MyStruct` cannot be sent between threads safely
> >    |
> >    = help: within `DmaSampleDriver`, the trait `Send` is not implemented for `*mut MyStruct`, which is required by `DmaSampleDriver: Send`
> > note: required because it appears within the type `CoherentAllocation<MyStruct>`
> >   --> rust/kernel/dma.rs:132:12  
> > note: required because it appears within the type `DmaSampleDriver`
> >   --> samples/rust/rust_dma.rs:9:8  
> >    |
> > 9  | struct DmaSampleDriver {
> >    |        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > note: required by a bound in `kernel::pci::Driver`
> >   --> rust/kernel/pci.rs:225:1  
> > 
> > error: aborting due to 1 previous error
> > 
> > For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
> > 
> > I have no idea what caused this - it built in next-20250321, but that
> > no longer builds, so I have reset to the version of the rust tree in
> > next-20250320 (commit 4a47eec07be6).
> 
> Actually, the driver-core tree gained these commits over the weekend:
> 
>   51d0de7596a4 ("rust: platform: require Send for Driver trait implementers")
>   935e1d90bf6f ("rust: pci: require Send for Driver trait implementers")
>   455943aa187f ("rust: platform: impl Send + Sync for platform::Device")
>   e2942bb4e629 ("rust: pci: impl Send + Sync for pci::Device")
> 
> A heads up would have been nice ... and maybe even a test merge and
> build against -next (given how late we are in the cycle).

Commit 935e1d90bf6f ("rust: pci: require Send for Driver trait implementers")
from the driver-core tree fixes a missing concurrency requirement, which commit
9901addae63b ("samples: rust: add Rust dma test sample driver") from the Rust
tree did not yet consider.

Technically, it did what it is supposed to do -- catch a concurrency issue at
compile time. However, since I was involved into both sides, I could have
thought of this, but unfortunately in this case it was too subtle for me to
spot -- sorry.

There are two options, 1. simply drop the commit [1] that introduces the
affected sample DMA code, or 2. apply the fix below to [2]. My preference would
be (2).

--

diff --git a/rust/kernel/dma.rs b/rust/kernel/dma.rs
index 9d00f9c49f47..18de693c4924 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/dma.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/dma.rs
@@ -301,6 +301,10 @@ fn drop(&mut self) {
     }
 }

+// SAFETY: It is safe to send a `CoherentAllocation` to another thread if `T`
+// can be send to another thread.
+unsafe impl<T: AsBytes + FromBytes + Send> Send for CoherentAllocation<T> {}
+
 /// Reads a field of an item from an allocated region of structs.
 ///
 /// # Examples

--

[1] 9901addae63b ("samples: rust: add Rust dma test sample driver")
[2] ad2907b4e308 ("rust: add dma coherent allocator abstraction")

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-24 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-24 10:57 linux-next: build failure after merge of the rust tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-24 11:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-24 11:59   ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2025-03-24 13:29     ` Greg KH
2025-03-24 13:43       ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-24 13:52         ` Greg KH
2025-03-24 15:18         ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-24 15:27           ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-24 15:40             ` Miguel Ojeda
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-17  8:04 Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-17 11:19 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-11-17 14:51 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-11-17 15:37   ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-11-17 16:11     ` Alice Ryhl
2025-06-24  7:31 Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-24 10:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-06-24 11:12   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-24 12:29     ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-06-24 12:00   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-24 12:14     ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-06-24 12:16       ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-06-24 12:24         ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-06-24 12:29           ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-06-24 12:25     ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-05-27  9:42 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-27 10:03 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-05-12  9:40 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-12 11:52 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-17 10:57 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-17 22:35 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-17 23:35   ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-18 11:37     ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-18 23:47       ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-19  9:06         ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-19  9:18           ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-10  5:28 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-10  9:28 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-01-10  9:34   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-10  9:41     ` Alice Ryhl
2025-01-10 10:07       ` Alice Ryhl
2025-01-10 10:08       ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-10 10:16     ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-10 10:38       ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-12-16  5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-16 10:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-12-16 10:59   ` Jocelyn Falempe
2024-12-16 16:24     ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-12-16 19:46       ` Jocelyn Falempe
2024-11-11  6:58 Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-11  8:16 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-11  8:28   ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-11 14:15     ` Gary Guo
2024-11-11 23:08       ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-11 23:58     ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-12  1:29       ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-12  6:30       ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-12  8:50         ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-09-28  4:09 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-28  4:18 ` Gary Guo
2021-09-28  5:52   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-28 23:37     ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-29 17:13       ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-09-29 17:25         ` Miguel Ojeda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z-FJH628-j2HCuaE@cassiopeiae \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox