Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bitmap tree

[Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 08:28:56PM +0100, Beata Michalska wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 06:23:29PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 09:16:34AM -0500, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:10:25PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > Hi Stephen,
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 12:49:34AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:35:02 +0100 Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I'm currently testing a proper fix for that one.
> > > > > > Should I just send it over as a diff to apply or rather a proper 'fixes' patch?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Maybe a proper 'fixes' patch, please, if easy - otherwise a diff is
> > > > > fine.
> > > > 
> > > > I just talked to Beata off-list. I think she'll try to use the current
> > > > for_each_cpu_wrap() API and avoid conflicts with the cpumask_next_wrap()
> > > > API change.
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Yes, for_each() loops are always preferable over opencoded iterating.
> > > Please feel free to CC me in case I can help.
> > 
> > Beata is going to post the official fix but in the meantime, to avoid
> > breaking next, I'll add my temporary fix:
> >
> Just posted the fix [1].
> Thank you all.
> 
> ---
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20250218192412.2072619-1-beata.michalska@arm.com/T/#u

Great, thanks. I'll queue it tomorrow.

-- 
Catalin