linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 364 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the ecryptfs tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):

  8b70deb8ca90 ("fs/ecryptfs: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page()")

This is commit

  031a0300f2c9 ("ecryptfs: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page()")

in the ecryptfs tree (where it has been since Sept, 2022).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Christian Brauner]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:11:14AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in the ecryptfs tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
> 
>   8b70deb8ca90 ("fs/ecryptfs: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page()")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   031a0300f2c9 ("ecryptfs: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page()")
> 
> in the ecryptfs tree (where it has been since Sept, 2022).

@Tyler, mind dropping it? I'll send it all in one go for v6.6.

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Tyler Hicks]

On 2023-07-19 08:16:03, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:11:14AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The following commit is also in the ecryptfs tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> > 
> >   8b70deb8ca90 ("fs/ecryptfs: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page()")
> > 
> > This is commit
> > 
> >   031a0300f2c9 ("ecryptfs: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page()")
> > 
> > in the ecryptfs tree (where it has been since Sept, 2022).
> 
> @Tyler, mind dropping it? I'll send it all in one go for v6.6.

Done. Thank you!

Tyler

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 335 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):

  7c62794bc37f ("open: make RESOLVE_CACHED correctly test for O_TMPFILE")

This is commit

  a0fc452a5d7f ("open: make RESOLVE_CACHED correctly test for O_TMPFILE")

in Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 346 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the iomap tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):

  de5b0b257ee3 ("iomap: handle error conditions more gracefully in iomap_to_bh")

This is commit

  4aa8cdd5e523 ("iomap: handle error conditions more gracefully in iomap_to_bh")

in the iomap tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Darrick J. Wong]

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 09:39:53AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in the iomap tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
> 
>   de5b0b257ee3 ("iomap: handle error conditions more gracefully in iomap_to_bh")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   4aa8cdd5e523 ("iomap: handle error conditions more gracefully in iomap_to_bh")
> 
> in the iomap tree.

Christian, do you want to push this to Linus instead of me?  I've a
couple more fixes that I'm about to send out to fsdevel and could just
roll all the iomap stuff into a single branch... but if you were about
to this to Linus I don't mind letting that happen.

--D

> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Christian Brauner]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 01:52:06PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 09:39:53AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The following commit is also in the iomap tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> > 
> >   de5b0b257ee3 ("iomap: handle error conditions more gracefully in iomap_to_bh")
> > 
> > This is commit
> > 
> >   4aa8cdd5e523 ("iomap: handle error conditions more gracefully in iomap_to_bh")
> > 
> > in the iomap tree.
> 
> Christian, do you want to push this to Linus instead of me?  I've a
> couple more fixes that I'm about to send out to fsdevel and could just
> roll all the iomap stuff into a single branch... but if you were about
> to this to Linus I don't mind letting that happen.

So I was about to send a pull request tomorrow. I thought I was supposed
to pick up iomap stuff. Let me know what you prefer. I can easily drop
this patch. :)

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Darrick J. Wong]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 02:34:01PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 01:52:06PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 09:39:53AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > The following commit is also in the iomap tree as a different commit
> > > (but the same patch):
> > > 
> > >   de5b0b257ee3 ("iomap: handle error conditions more gracefully in iomap_to_bh")
> > > 
> > > This is commit
> > > 
> > >   4aa8cdd5e523 ("iomap: handle error conditions more gracefully in iomap_to_bh")
> > > 
> > > in the iomap tree.
> > 
> > Christian, do you want to push this to Linus instead of me?  I've a
> > couple more fixes that I'm about to send out to fsdevel and could just
> > roll all the iomap stuff into a single branch... but if you were about
> > to this to Linus I don't mind letting that happen.
> 
> So I was about to send a pull request tomorrow. I thought I was supposed
> to pick up iomap stuff. Let me know what you prefer. I can easily drop
> this patch. :)

I'll push that patch, then.

In general, you can fling any non-trivial iomap patches at me, since I
will likely want to run them through my testing cloud anyway.

(And just to be clear: I don't mind if you push things like trivial api
cleanups that are part of another series through your main vfs tree.)

--D

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Christian Brauner]

> I'll push that patch, then.

Ok, dropping.

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 402 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the mm tree as a different commit (but
the same patch):

  41ef33da2c49 ("iov_iter: Avoid wrap-around instrumentation in copy_compat_iovec_from_user()")

This is commit

  40bd16cd9ec8 ("iov_iter: avoid wrap-around instrumentation in copy_compat_iovec_from_user()")

in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 355 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):

  0b9887fae769 ("fs/aio: Check IOCB_AIO_RW before the struct aio_kiocb conversion")

This is commit

  961ebd120565 ("fs/aio: Check IOCB_AIO_RW before the struct aio_kiocb conversion")

in Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 293 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):

  9ddf5fe47f2e ("fs,block: get holder during claim")

This is commit

  59a55a63c246 ("fs,block: get holder during claim")

in Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 372 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
commits (but the same patch):

  08ce6f724ce9 ("proc: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")

This is commit

  d92c9986e4db ("proc: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")

in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 566 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:48:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I meant the mm tree, obviously.

> commits (but the same patch):
> 
>   08ce6f724ce9 ("proc: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   d92c9986e4db ("proc: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
> 
> in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:48:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
> commits (but the same patch):
> 
>   08ce6f724ce9 ("proc: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   d92c9986e4db ("proc: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
> 
> in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree.

That's one patch from a three-patch series in a different tree.

Also,

hp2:/usr/src/mm> git log fs/proc/ | grep "Signed-off-by.*brauner" | wc -l  
22
hp2:/usr/src/mm> git log fs/proc/ | grep "Signed-off-by.*akpm" | wc -l 
1211

Christian, if procfs patches are to henceforth go via the vfs tree,
let's be a bit more organized about it?

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Christian Brauner]

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 07:21:41PM GMT, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:48:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
> > commits (but the same patch):
> > 
> >   08ce6f724ce9 ("proc: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
> > 
> > This is commit
> > 
> >   d92c9986e4db ("proc: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
> > 
> > in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree.
> 
> That's one patch from a three-patch series in a different tree.
> 
> Also,
> 
> hp2:/usr/src/mm> git log fs/proc/ | grep "Signed-off-by.*brauner" | wc -l  
> 22
> hp2:/usr/src/mm> git log fs/proc/ | grep "Signed-off-by.*akpm" | wc -l 
> 1211
> 
> Christian, if procfs patches are to henceforth go via the vfs tree,
> let's be a bit more organized about it?

Sure. I simply didn't see any any "applied" message from you so I just
assumed to pick the parts that are relevant. Sorry about that.

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:17:01 +0200 Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote:

> > 
> > Christian, if procfs patches are to henceforth go via the vfs tree,
> > let's be a bit more organized about it?
> 
> Sure. I simply didn't see any any "applied" message from you so I just
> assumed to pick the parts that are relevant. Sorry about that.

No probs.  If the author didn't cc you then my remember-to-cc-christian
brain cell is unreliable :(

It'll be at https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/ but that's a hassle.

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Marion & Christophe JAILLET]

Le 13/06/2024 à 21:43, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:17:01 +0200 Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>>> Christian, if procfs patches are to henceforth go via the vfs tree,
>>> let's be a bit more organized about it?
>> Sure. I simply didn't see any any "applied" message from you so I just
>> assumed to pick the parts that are relevant. Sorry about that.
> No probs.  If the author didn't cc you then my remember-to-cc-christian
> brain cell is unreliable :(

I guess, that the author is me.

in my .gitconfig, I use

[sendemail.linux]
     tocmd ="`pwd`/scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback 
--norolestats --nol"
     cccmd ="`pwd`/scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback 
--norolestats --nom"

and

 >scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats --nol 
fs/proc/generic.c
[EMPTY OUTPUT]

 >scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats --nol 
fs/proc/generic.c
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org


Should MAINTAINERS be updated somewhere?


(sorry for the mess I've generated :( )


CJ


>
> It'll be at https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/ but that's a hassle.
>

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 356 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the mm-nonmm-stable tree as a different
commit (but the same patch):

  7f07ee5a23a5 ("proc: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")

This is commit

  cda1c8e0c33d ("proc: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")

in the mm-nonmm-stable tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 207 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the vfs-brauner-fixes tree as a different
commit (but the same patch):

  8b30d568bd8d ("vfs: drop one lock trip in evict()")

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 287 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the ntfs3 tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):

  c4c9c89c8c8e ("ntfs3: Remove reset_log_file()")

This is commit

  3205fe852665 ("fs/ntfs3: Remove reset_log_file()")

in the ntfs3 tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Christian Brauner]

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 08:24:48AM GMT, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in the ntfs3 tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
> 
>   c4c9c89c8c8e ("ntfs3: Remove reset_log_file()")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   3205fe852665 ("fs/ntfs3: Remove reset_log_file()")
> 
> in the ntfs3 tree.

Please drop this patch. It's part of Willy's work.write.end series
that's been in -next for a long time now.

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 374 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the mm tree as a different commit (but
the same patch):

  af6505e5745b ("fs: add RWF_DONTCACHE iocb and FOP_DONTCACHE file_operations flag")

This is commit

  aa1afdf5cfa9 ("fs: add RWF_DONTCACHE iocb and FOP_DONTCACHE file_operations flag")

in the mm-unstable branch of the mm tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 595 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 11:18:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> The following commit is also in the mm tree as a different commit (but
> the same patch):
> 
>   af6505e5745b ("fs: add RWF_DONTCACHE iocb and FOP_DONTCACHE file_operations flag")

This is now in Linus' tree.

> This is commit
> 
>   aa1afdf5cfa9 ("fs: add RWF_DONTCACHE iocb and FOP_DONTCACHE file_operations flag")

This is now commit

  096a474e8872 ("fs: add RWF_DONTCACHE iocb and FOP_DONTCACHE file_operations flag")

in the mm-stable tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 401 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the mm-hotfixes tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):

  a560758705a6 ("mm: shmem: Use signed int for version handling in casefold option")

This is commit

  99b24f3ad327 ("mm: shmem: use signed int for version handling in casefold option")

in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch of the mm-hotfixes tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 552 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:16:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> The following commit is also in the mm-hotfixes tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
> 
>   a560758705a6 ("mm: shmem: Use signed int for version handling in casefold option")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   99b24f3ad327 ("mm: shmem: use signed int for version handling in casefold option")
> 
> in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch of the mm-hotfixes tree.

This latter commit is now in Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 374 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the vfs-brauner-fixes tree as a different
commit (but the same patch):

  b1eb86b028e1 ("fs: ensure that *path_locked*() helpers leave passed path pristine")

This is commit

  a681b7c17dd2 ("fs: ensure that *path_locked*() helpers leave passed path pristine")

in the vfs-brauner tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Christian Brauner]

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 08:49:49AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in the vfs-brauner-fixes tree as a different
> commit (but the same patch):
> 
>   b1eb86b028e1 ("fs: ensure that *path_locked*() helpers leave passed path pristine")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   a681b7c17dd2 ("fs: ensure that *path_locked*() helpers leave passed path pristine")
> 
> in the vfs-brauner tree.

Fixed a few days ago. Thanks!

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 332 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the fuse tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):

  8d9117009dd6 ("fuse: don't allow signals to interrupt getdents copying")

This is commit

  376464b93692 ("fuse: don't allow signals to interrupt getdents copying")

in the fuse tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 609 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Wed, 21 May 2025 09:45:51 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> The following commit is also in the fuse tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
> 
>   8d9117009dd6 ("fuse: don't allow signals to interrupt getdents copying")

also
  e0410e956b97 ("readdir: supply dir_context.count as readdir buffer size hint")

> This is commit
> 
>   376464b93692 ("fuse: don't allow signals to interrupt getdents copying")

  3bd894a88be0 ("readdir: supply dir_context.count as readdir buffer size hint")

> in the fuse tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 337 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the vfs-brauner-fixes tree as a different
commit (but the same patch):

  8c0bcafc722c ("coredump: fix PIDFD_INFO_COREDUMP ioctl check")

This is commit

  830a9e37cfb2 ("coredump: fix PIDFD_INFO_COREDUMP ioctl check")

in te vfs-brauner-fixes tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Christian Brauner]

On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 09:51:18AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in the vfs-brauner-fixes tree as a different
> commit (but the same patch):
> 
>   8c0bcafc722c ("coredump: fix PIDFD_INFO_COREDUMP ioctl check")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   830a9e37cfb2 ("coredump: fix PIDFD_INFO_COREDUMP ioctl check")
> 
> in te vfs-brauner-fixes tree.

Interesting. Are you merging vfs.fixes separately? Fwiw, I always merge
vfs.fixes into vfs.all. So if it's easier for you you can drop merging
vfs.fixes separately.

Christian

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 849 bytes --]

Hi Christian,

On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 10:35:31 +0200 Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 09:51:18AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > The following commit is also in the vfs-brauner-fixes tree as a different
> > commit (but the same patch):
> > 
> >   8c0bcafc722c ("coredump: fix PIDFD_INFO_COREDUMP ioctl check")
> > 
> > This is commit
> > 
> >   830a9e37cfb2 ("coredump: fix PIDFD_INFO_COREDUMP ioctl check")
> > 
> > in te vfs-brauner-fixes tree.  
> 
> Interesting. Are you merging vfs.fixes separately? Fwiw, I always merge
> vfs.fixes into vfs.all. So if it's easier for you you can drop merging
> vfs.fixes separately.

I merge all the fixes branches early so I don't have to worry about bugs
in Linus' tree that already have fixes available.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 340 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the driver-core.current tree as a
different commit (but the same patch):

  8e7e265d558e ("debugfs: fix mount options not being applied")

This is commit

  ba6cc29351b1 ("debugfs: fix mount options not being applied")

in the driver-core.current tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 11:02:12AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commit is also in the driver-core.current tree as a
> different commit (but the same patch):
> 
>   8e7e265d558e ("debugfs: fix mount options not being applied")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   ba6cc29351b1 ("debugfs: fix mount options not being applied")
> 
> in the driver-core.current tree.

Thanks, yeah, we both ended up picking this one up :(