linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1769 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the kvm tree, today's linux-next build (arm64 defconfig)
failed like this:

In file included from <command-line>:
In function 'check_res_bits',
    inlined from 'kvm_sys_reg_table_init' at arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c:4109:2:
include/linux/compiler_types.h:449:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_591' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_RES0 != (GENMASK_ULL(63, 0))
  449 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
      |                                             ^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:430:25: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
  430 |                         prefix ## suffix();                             \
      |                         ^~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:449:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
  449 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
   39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
      |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
   50 |         BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h:58:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
   58 |         BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_RES0       != (GENMASK_ULL(63, 0)));
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~

I bisected this to the merge of the kvm-arm tree into linux-next but I
could not figure out why it fails :-(

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Joey Gouly]

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:03:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the kvm tree, today's linux-next build (arm64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> In file included from <command-line>:
> In function 'check_res_bits',
>     inlined from 'kvm_sys_reg_table_init' at arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c:4109:2:
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:449:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_591' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_RES0 != (GENMASK_ULL(63, 0))
>   449 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>       |                                             ^
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:430:25: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
>   430 |                         prefix ## suffix();                             \
>       |                         ^~~~~~
> include/linux/compiler_types.h:449:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
>   449 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
>    39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
>       |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
>    50 |         BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h:58:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
>    58 |         BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_RES0       != (GENMASK_ULL(63, 0)));
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> I bisected this to the merge of the kvm-arm tree into linux-next but I
> could not figure out why it fails :-(
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

This fails because https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?id=fdd867fe9b32
added new fields to that register (ID_AA64DFR1_EL1)

and commit b80b701d5a6 ("KVM: arm64: Snapshot all non-zero RES0/RES1 sysreg fields for later checking")
took a snapshot of the fields, so the RES0 (reserved 0) bits don't match anymore.

Not sure how to resolve it in the git branches though.

Thanks,
Joey

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3863 bytes --]

Hi Joey,

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:11:29 +0000 Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:03:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > After merging the kvm tree, today's linux-next build (arm64 defconfig)
> > failed like this:
> > 
> > In file included from <command-line>:
> > In function 'check_res_bits',
> >     inlined from 'kvm_sys_reg_table_init' at arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c:4109:2:
> > include/linux/compiler_types.h:449:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_591' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_RES0 != (GENMASK_ULL(63, 0))
> >   449 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> >       |                                             ^
> > include/linux/compiler_types.h:430:25: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
> >   430 |                         prefix ## suffix();                             \
> >       |                         ^~~~~~
> > include/linux/compiler_types.h:449:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
> >   449 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> >       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
> >    39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
> >       |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
> >    50 |         BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
> >       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h:58:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
> >    58 |         BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_RES0       != (GENMASK_ULL(63, 0)));
> >       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 
> > I bisected this to the merge of the kvm-arm tree into linux-next but I
> > could not figure out why it fails :-(
> > 
> > -- 
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell  
> 
> This fails because https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?id=fdd867fe9b32
> added new fields to that register (ID_AA64DFR1_EL1)
> 
> and commit b80b701d5a6 ("KVM: arm64: Snapshot all non-zero RES0/RES1 sysreg fields for later checking")
> took a snapshot of the fields, so the RES0 (reserved 0) bits don't match anymore.
> 
> Not sure how to resolve it in the git branches though.

Thanks.  I will apply this patch to the merge of the kvm-arm tree from
tomorrow (and at the end of today's tree).

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:31:22 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1"

interacting with "KVM: arm64: Snapshot all non-zero RES0/RES1 sysreg fields for later checking"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h
index 967b5d171d53..39f537875d17 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h
@@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ static inline void check_res_bits(void)
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(62, 61) | GENMASK_ULL(51, 49) | GENMASK_ULL(31, 31) | GENMASK_ULL(27, 0)));
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64FPFR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 32) | GENMASK_ULL(27, 2)));
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(27, 24) | GENMASK_ULL(19, 16)));
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 0)));
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64AFR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 32)));
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64AFR1_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 0)));
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(3, 0)));
-- 
2.43.0

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 2/22/24 12:40, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> This fails because https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?id=fdd867fe9b32
>> added new fields to that register (ID_AA64DFR1_EL1)
>>
>> and commit b80b701d5a6 ("KVM: arm64: Snapshot all non-zero RES0/RES1 sysreg fields for later checking")
>> took a snapshot of the fields, so the RES0 (reserved 0) bits don't match anymore.
>>
>> Not sure how to resolve it in the git branches though.
> 
> Thanks.  I will apply this patch to the merge of the kvm-arm tree from
> tomorrow (and at the end of today's tree).

Marc, Iliver, can you get a topic branch from Catalin and friends for 
this sysreg patch, and apply the fixup directly to the kvm-arm branch in 
the merge commit?

Not _necessary_, as I can always ask Linus to do the fixup, but 
generally he prefers to have this sorted out by the maintainers if it is 
detected by linux-next.

Paolo


> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:31:22 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1"
> 
> interacting with "KVM: arm64: Snapshot all non-zero RES0/RES1 sysreg fields for later checking"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h
> index 967b5d171d53..39f537875d17 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h
> @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ static inline void check_res_bits(void)
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(62, 61) | GENMASK_ULL(51, 49) | GENMASK_ULL(31, 31) | GENMASK_ULL(27, 0)));
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64FPFR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 32) | GENMASK_ULL(27, 2)));
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(27, 24) | GENMASK_ULL(19, 16)));
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 0)));
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64AFR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 32)));
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64AFR1_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 0)));
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(3, 0)));

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 2/22/24 12:40, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> This fails because https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?id=fdd867fe9b32
>> added new fields to that register (ID_AA64DFR1_EL1)
>>
>> and commit b80b701d5a6 ("KVM: arm64: Snapshot all non-zero RES0/RES1 sysreg fields for later checking")
>> took a snapshot of the fields, so the RES0 (reserved 0) bits don't match anymore.
>>
>> Not sure how to resolve it in the git branches though.
> 
> Thanks.  I will apply this patch to the merge of the kvm-arm tree from
> tomorrow (and at the end of today's tree).

Marc, Oliver, can you get a topic branch from Catalin and friends for 
this sysreg patch, and apply the fixup directly to the kvm-arm branch in 
the merge commit?

Not _necessary_, as I can always ask Linus to do the fixup, but 
generally he prefers to have this sorted out by the maintainers if it is 
detected by linux-next.

Paolo


> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:31:22 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1"
> 
> interacting with "KVM: arm64: Snapshot all non-zero RES0/RES1 sysreg fields for later checking"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h
> index 967b5d171d53..39f537875d17 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h
> @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ static inline void check_res_bits(void)
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(62, 61) | GENMASK_ULL(51, 49) | GENMASK_ULL(31, 31) | GENMASK_ULL(27, 0)));
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64FPFR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 32) | GENMASK_ULL(27, 2)));
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(27, 24) | GENMASK_ULL(19, 16)));
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 0)));
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64AFR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 32)));
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64AFR1_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 0)));
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1_RES0	!= (GENMASK_ULL(3, 0)));

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Marc Zyngier]

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:11:59 +0000,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2/22/24 12:40, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> This fails because https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?id=fdd867fe9b32
> >> added new fields to that register (ID_AA64DFR1_EL1)
> >> 
> >> and commit b80b701d5a6 ("KVM: arm64: Snapshot all non-zero RES0/RES1 sysreg fields for later checking")
> >> took a snapshot of the fields, so the RES0 (reserved 0) bits don't match anymore.
> >> 
> >> Not sure how to resolve it in the git branches though.
> > 
> > Thanks.  I will apply this patch to the merge of the kvm-arm tree from
> > tomorrow (and at the end of today's tree).
> 
> Marc, Oliver, can you get a topic branch from Catalin and friends for
> this sysreg patch, and apply the fixup directly to the kvm-arm branch
> in the merge commit?
> 
> Not _necessary_, as I can always ask Linus to do the fixup, but
> generally he prefers to have this sorted out by the maintainers if it
> is detected by linux-next.

I think that's not the correct thing to do at this time. I should have
timed the introduction of these checks a bit later, after the merge
window.

But more to the point, the proposed patch is also not the best thing
to merge, because it hides that there is a discrepancy between what
the architecture describes, and what KVM knows. I really want to know
about it, or it will be yet another bug that we wont detect easily.
Specially for ID_AA64DFR*_EL1 which are a bloody mine-field.

So I'd rather we make the check optional, and we'll play catch up for
a bit longer. Something like the patch below.

Oliver, do you mind queuing this ASAP (also pushed out to my dev
branch)?

Thanks,

	M.

From 85d861a6ca055c7681c826c580e7c90d74c26ac5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:12:09 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Make build-time check of RES0/RES1 bits optional

In order to ease the transition towards a state of absolute
paranoia where all RES0/RES1 bits gets checked against what
KVM know of them, make the checks optional and garded by a
config symbol (CONFIG_KVM_ARM64_RES_BITS_PARANOIA) default to n.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig          | 11 +++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
index 5c2a672c06a8..fa9389270cfe 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
@@ -67,4 +67,15 @@ config PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE
 
 	  If unsure, or not using protected nVHE (pKVM), say N.
 
+config KVM_ARM64_RES_BITS_PARANOIA
+	bool "Build-time check of RES0/RES1 bits"
+	depends on KVM
+	default n
+	help
+	  Say Y here to validate that KVM's knowledge of most system
+	  registers' RES0/RES1 bits matches when the rest of the kernel
+	  defines. Expect the build to fail badly if you enable this.
+
+	  Just say N.
+
 endif # VIRTUALIZATION
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h
index 967b5d171d53..2d98e60efc3c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/check-res-bits.h
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
  */
 static inline void check_res_bits(void)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM64_RES_BITS_PARANOIA
+
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(OSDTRRX_EL1_RES0		!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 32)));
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(MDCCINT_EL1_RES0		!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 31) | GENMASK_ULL(28, 0)));
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(MDSCR_EL1_RES0		!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 36) | GENMASK_ULL(28, 28) | GENMASK_ULL(25, 24) | GENMASK_ULL(20, 20) | GENMASK_ULL(18, 16) | GENMASK_ULL(11, 7) | GENMASK_ULL(5, 1)));
@@ -118,4 +120,6 @@ static inline void check_res_bits(void)
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(TRBMAR_EL1_RES0		!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 12)));
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(TRBTRG_EL1_RES0		!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 32)));
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(TRBIDR_EL1_RES0		!= (GENMASK_ULL(63, 12) | GENMASK_ULL(7, 6)));
+
+#endif
 }
-- 
2.39.2


-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Oliver Upton]

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:31:38PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:11:59 +0000,
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On 2/22/24 12:40, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >> This fails because https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?id=fdd867fe9b32
> > >> added new fields to that register (ID_AA64DFR1_EL1)
> > >> 
> > >> and commit b80b701d5a6 ("KVM: arm64: Snapshot all non-zero RES0/RES1 sysreg fields for later checking")
> > >> took a snapshot of the fields, so the RES0 (reserved 0) bits don't match anymore.
> > >> 
> > >> Not sure how to resolve it in the git branches though.
> > > 
> > > Thanks.  I will apply this patch to the merge of the kvm-arm tree from
> > > tomorrow (and at the end of today's tree).
> > 
> > Marc, Oliver, can you get a topic branch from Catalin and friends for
> > this sysreg patch, and apply the fixup directly to the kvm-arm branch
> > in the merge commit?
> > 
> > Not _necessary_, as I can always ask Linus to do the fixup, but
> > generally he prefers to have this sorted out by the maintainers if it
> > is detected by linux-next.
> 
> I think that's not the correct thing to do at this time. I should have
> timed the introduction of these checks a bit later, after the merge
> window.
> 
> But more to the point, the proposed patch is also not the best thing
> to merge, because it hides that there is a discrepancy between what
> the architecture describes, and what KVM knows. I really want to know
> about it, or it will be yet another bug that we wont detect easily.
> Specially for ID_AA64DFR*_EL1 which are a bloody mine-field.
> 
> So I'd rather we make the check optional, and we'll play catch up for
> a bit longer. Something like the patch below.
> 
> Oliver, do you mind queuing this ASAP (also pushed out to my dev
> branch)?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 
> From 85d861a6ca055c7681c826c580e7c90d74c26ac5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:12:09 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Make build-time check of RES0/RES1 bits optional
> 
> In order to ease the transition towards a state of absolute
> paranoia where all RES0/RES1 bits gets checked against what
> KVM know of them, make the checks optional and garded by a
> config symbol (CONFIG_KVM_ARM64_RES_BITS_PARANOIA) default to n.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

Applied as commit 99101dda29e3 ("KVM: arm64: Make build-time check of
RES0/RES1 bits optional") on the kvmarm/next branch.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4196 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm64
defconfig) failed like this:

In file included from <command-line>:
/tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c: In function 'setup_s1_walk':
/tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c:229:30: error: 'TCR_SH1_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'TCR_SH0_MASK'?
  229 |                    FIELD_GET(TCR_SH1_MASK, tcr) :
      |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/compiler_types.h:577:23: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
  577 |                 if (!(condition))                                       \
      |                       ^~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/compiler_types.h:597:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
  597 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
   39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
      |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/bitfield.h:65:17: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
   65 |                 BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__builtin_constant_p(_mask),          \
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/bitfield.h:155:17: note: in expansion of macro '__BF_FIELD_CHECK'
  155 |                 __BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, _reg, 0U, "FIELD_GET: ");       \
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c:229:20: note: in expansion of macro 'FIELD_GET'
  229 |                    FIELD_GET(TCR_SH1_MASK, tcr) :
      |                    ^~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c:229:30: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
  229 |                    FIELD_GET(TCR_SH1_MASK, tcr) :
      |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/compiler_types.h:577:23: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
  577 |                 if (!(condition))                                       \
      |                       ^~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/compiler_types.h:597:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
  597 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
   39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
      |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/bitfield.h:65:17: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
   65 |                 BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__builtin_constant_p(_mask),          \
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/include/linux/bitfield.h:155:17: note: in expansion of macro '__BF_FIELD_CHECK'
  155 |                 __BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, _reg, 0U, "FIELD_GET: ");       \
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c:229:20: note: in expansion of macro 'FIELD_GET'
  229 |                    FIELD_GET(TCR_SH1_MASK, tcr) :
      |                    ^~~~~~~~~
make[5]: *** [/tmp/next/build/scripts/Makefile.build:287: arch/arm64/kvm/at.o] Error 1
make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[4]: *** [/tmp/next/build/scripts/Makefile.build:556: arch/arm64/kvm] Error 2
make[3]: *** [/tmp/next/build/scripts/Makefile.build:556: arch/arm64] Error 2
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: *** [/tmp/next/build/Makefile:2011: .] Error 2
make[1]: *** [/tmp/next/build/Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
Command exited with non-zero status 2
178.88user 199.89system 0:12.26elapsed 3087%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 429304maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (4major+2413868minor)pagefaults 0swaps

Caused by commit

   4f91624778b27 ("arm64/sysreg: Replace TCR_EL1 field macros")

from the arm64 tree.  I have reverted that commit.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 05:28:05PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm64
> defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> In file included from <command-line>:
> /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c: In function 'setup_s1_walk':
> /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c:229:30: error: 'TCR_SH1_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'TCR_SH0_MASK'?
>   229 |                    FIELD_GET(TCR_SH1_MASK, tcr) :
>       |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~

[...]

> Caused by commit
> 
>    4f91624778b27 ("arm64/sysreg: Replace TCR_EL1 field macros")
> 
> from the arm64 tree.  I have reverted that commit.

Thanks, I'll drop it from arm64 as well.

Will

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 05:02:02PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 05:28:05PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm64
> > defconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > In file included from <command-line>:
> > /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c: In function 'setup_s1_walk':
> > /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c:229:30: error: 'TCR_SH1_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'TCR_SH0_MASK'?
> >   229 |                    FIELD_GET(TCR_SH1_MASK, tcr) :
> >       |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Caused by commit
> > 
> >    4f91624778b27 ("arm64/sysreg: Replace TCR_EL1 field macros")
> > 
> > from the arm64 tree.  I have reverted that commit.
> 
> Thanks, I'll drop it from arm64 as well.

(now dropped)

Will

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 23/09/25 10:14 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 05:02:02PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 05:28:05PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm64
>>> defconfig) failed like this:
>>>
>>> In file included from <command-line>:
>>> /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c: In function 'setup_s1_walk':
>>> /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c:229:30: error: 'TCR_SH1_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'TCR_SH0_MASK'?
>>>   229 |                    FIELD_GET(TCR_SH1_MASK, tcr) :
>>>       |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Caused by commit
>>>
>>>    4f91624778b27 ("arm64/sysreg: Replace TCR_EL1 field macros")
>>>
>>> from the arm64 tree.  I have reverted that commit.
>>
>> Thanks, I'll drop it from arm64 as well.
> 
> (now dropped)

Hello Will/Mark,

The conflict happened as the commit c0cc438046ee (“KVM: arm64: Compute shareability for LPA2”)
which came in via the KVM tree, added a new TCR_SH1_MASK instance. Shall I respin the patches
accommodating the new changes from KVM or just wait for the next merge window ?

- Anshuman

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 08:07:16AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 23/09/25 10:14 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 05:02:02PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 05:28:05PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm64
> >>> defconfig) failed like this:
> >>>
> >>> In file included from <command-line>:
> >>> /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c: In function 'setup_s1_walk':
> >>> /tmp/next/build/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c:229:30: error: 'TCR_SH1_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'TCR_SH0_MASK'?
> >>>   229 |                    FIELD_GET(TCR_SH1_MASK, tcr) :
> >>>       |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> Caused by commit
> >>>
> >>>    4f91624778b27 ("arm64/sysreg: Replace TCR_EL1 field macros")
> >>>
> >>> from the arm64 tree.  I have reverted that commit.
> >>
> >> Thanks, I'll drop it from arm64 as well.
> > 
> > (now dropped)
> 
> Hello Will/Mark,
> 
> The conflict happened as the commit c0cc438046ee (“KVM: arm64: Compute shareability for LPA2”)
> which came in via the KVM tree, added a new TCR_SH1_MASK instance. Shall I respin the patches
> accommodating the new changes from KVM or just wait for the next merge window ?

Probably best to wait at this stage. I don't think anybody is depending
on the cleanup for anything but please correct me if I'm wrong.

Will

linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 538 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
failed like this:

Using /home/sfr/kernels/next/next/scripts/kernel-doc.pl

Sphinx parallel build error:
docutils.utils.SystemMessage: Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/arm-vgic-v3.rst:128: (SEVERE/4) Unexpected section title or transition.

=====================

Caused by commit

  eed9b1420907 ("Documentation: KVM: arm64: Describe VGICv3 registers writable pre-init")

I have reverted that commit for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Oliver Upton]

On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 02:22:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> failed like this:
> 
> Using /home/sfr/kernels/next/next/scripts/kernel-doc.pl
> 
> Sphinx parallel build error:
> docutils.utils.SystemMessage: Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/arm-vgic-v3.rst:128: (SEVERE/4) Unexpected section title or transition.
> 
> =====================
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   eed9b1420907 ("Documentation: KVM: arm64: Describe VGICv3 registers writable pre-init")
> 
> I have reverted that commit for today.

Thanks for taking care of this. Paolo has queued the fix after pulling
from kvmarm, should go away tomorrow.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git/commit/?h=next&id=6836e1f30fe90e4c19f6a3749e97ba1e44a840ef

Best,
Oliver

linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2620 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm64 defconfig)
failed like this:

arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c: In function 'has_impdef_pmuv3':
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:279:38: error: passing argument 1 of 'is_midr_in_range_list' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
  279 |         return is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), impdef_pmuv3_cpus);
      |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                      |
      |                                      u32 {aka unsigned int}
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:47:53: note: expected 'const struct midr_range *' but argument is of type 'u32' {aka 'unsigned int'}
   47 | bool is_midr_in_range_list(struct midr_range const *ranges)
      |                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:279:16: error: too many arguments to function 'is_midr_in_range_list'
  279 |         return is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), impdef_pmuv3_cpus);
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:47:6: note: declared here
   47 | bool is_midr_in_range_list(struct midr_range const *ranges)
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Caused by commit

  1f561ad4b8f5 ("Merge branch 'kvm-arm64/pv-cpuid' into new-next")

The merge missed fixing up this instance from commit

  e1231aacb065 ("arm64: Enable IMP DEF PMUv3 traps on Apple M*")

I have applied the following patch for today (but this should go into
the kvm-arm tree (perhaps squashed into the above merge).

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:24:04 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "Merge branch 'kvm-arm64/pv-cpuid' into new-next"

interacting with "arm64: Enable IMP DEF PMUv3 traps on Apple M*"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
index caac9e10a5bb..b55f5f705750 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static bool has_impdef_pmuv3(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int sco
 	if (pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF)
 		return false;
 
-	return is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), impdef_pmuv3_cpus);
+	return is_midr_in_range_list(impdef_pmuv3_cpus);
 }
 
 static void cpu_enable_impdef_pmuv3_traps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
-- 
2.45.2

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Oliver Upton]

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:32:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c: In function 'has_impdef_pmuv3':
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:279:38: error: passing argument 1 of 'is_midr_in_range_list' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
>   279 |         return is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), impdef_pmuv3_cpus);
>       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                      |
>       |                                      u32 {aka unsigned int}
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:47:53: note: expected 'const struct midr_range *' but argument is of type 'u32' {aka 'unsigned int'}
>    47 | bool is_midr_in_range_list(struct midr_range const *ranges)
>       |                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:279:16: error: too many arguments to function 'is_midr_in_range_list'
>   279 |         return is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), impdef_pmuv3_cpus);
>       |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:47:6: note: declared here
>    47 | bool is_midr_in_range_list(struct midr_range const *ranges)
>       |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   1f561ad4b8f5 ("Merge branch 'kvm-arm64/pv-cpuid' into new-next")
> 
> The merge missed fixing up this instance from commit
> 
>   e1231aacb065 ("arm64: Enable IMP DEF PMUv3 traps on Apple M*")
> 
> I have applied the following patch for today (but this should go into
> the kvm-arm tree (perhaps squashed into the above merge).

Thanks Stephen for the fix. Looks like I forgot to push /next when I
pushed out the tag, addressing now.

Thanks,
Oliver

linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2867 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:

drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:58:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   58 | void  __init kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init(void)
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c: In function 'kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init':
drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:89:39: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
   89 |         target = memblock_alloc(sizeof(*target) * max_cpus,  __alignof__(*target));
      |                                       ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:89:62: error: invalid application of '__alignof__' to incomplete type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
   89 |         target = memblock_alloc(sizeof(*target) * max_cpus,  __alignof__(*target));
      |                                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:102:23: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
  102 |                 target[i].midr = res.a1;
      |                       ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:102:26: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
  102 |                 target[i].midr = res.a1;
      |                          ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:103:23: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
  103 |                 target[i].revidr = res.a2;
      |                       ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:103:26: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
  103 |                 target[i].revidr = res.a2;
      |                          ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:104:23: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
  104 |                 target[i].aidr = res.a3;
      |                       ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:104:26: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
  104 |                 target[i].aidr = res.a3;
      |                          ^
drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:107:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_errata_set_target_impl' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  107 |         if (!cpu_errata_set_target_impl(max_cpus, target)) {
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:116:37: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
  116 |         memblock_free(target, sizeof(*target) * max_cpus);
      |                                     ^

Caused by commit

  86edf6bdcf05 ("smccc/kvm_guest: Enable errata based on implementation CPUs")

I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20250305 for today.



-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Shameerali Kolothum Thodi]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 5:46 AM
> To: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>; Marc Zyngier
> <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>; Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Linux Next Mailing List <linux-
> next@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:58:14: warning: no previous prototype
> for 'kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>    58 | void  __init kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init(void)
>       |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c: In function
> 'kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init':
> drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:89:39: error: invalid application of
> 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
>    89 |         target = memblock_alloc(sizeof(*target) * max_cpus,
> __alignof__(*target));
>       |                                       ^
> drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:89:62: error: invalid application of
> '__alignof__' to incomplete type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
>    89 |         target = memblock_alloc(sizeof(*target) * max_cpus,
> __alignof__(*target));
>       |                                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:102:23: error: invalid use of undefined
> type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
>   102 |                 target[i].midr = res.a1;
>       |                       ^
> drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:102:26: error: invalid use of undefined
> type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
>   102 |                 target[i].midr = res.a1;
>       |                          ^
> drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:103:23: error: invalid use of undefined
> type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
>   103 |                 target[i].revidr = res.a2;
>       |                       ^
> drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:103:26: error: invalid use of undefined
> type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
>   103 |                 target[i].revidr = res.a2;
>       |                          ^
> drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:104:23: error: invalid use of undefined
> type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
>   104 |                 target[i].aidr = res.a3;
>       |                       ^
> drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:104:26: error: invalid use of undefined
> type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
>   104 |                 target[i].aidr = res.a3;
>       |                          ^
> drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:107:14: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'cpu_errata_set_target_impl' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   107 |         if (!cpu_errata_set_target_impl(max_cpus, target)) {
>       |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:116:37: error: invalid application of
> 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
>   116 |         memblock_free(target, sizeof(*target) * max_cpus);
>       |                                     ^
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   86edf6bdcf05 ("smccc/kvm_guest: Enable errata based on implementation
> CPUs")
> 
> I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20250305 for today.

Thanks for reporting this.

Hmm..kvm_guest.c gets build through HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY 
which is selected by ARM_GIC_V3.

We could limit the kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init() to ARM64 to fix this
like below as these hypercall is only supported for KVM/ARM64.

Or is there a better way to handle this?

Thanks,
Shameer

---8---
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
b/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
index 2f03b582c298..5767aed25cdc 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ bool kvm_arm_hyp_service_available(u32 func_id)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_arm_hyp_service_available);

+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
 void  __init kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init(void)
 {
        int i;
@@ -115,3 +116,4 @@ void  __init kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init(void)
 mem_free:
        memblock_free(target, sizeof(*target) * max_cpus);
 }
+#endif

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Marc Zyngier]

On Thu, 06 Mar 2025 09:56:32 +0000,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 5:46 AM
> > To: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>; Marc Zyngier
> > <maz@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>; Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Linux Next Mailing List <linux-
> > next@vger.kernel.org>
> > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:58:14: warning: no previous prototype
> > for 'kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >    58 | void  __init kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init(void)
> >       |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c: In function
> > 'kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init':
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:89:39: error: invalid application of
> > 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> >    89 |         target = memblock_alloc(sizeof(*target) * max_cpus,
> > __alignof__(*target));
> >       |                                       ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:89:62: error: invalid application of
> > '__alignof__' to incomplete type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> >    89 |         target = memblock_alloc(sizeof(*target) * max_cpus,
> > __alignof__(*target));
> >       |                                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:102:23: error: invalid use of undefined
> > type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> >   102 |                 target[i].midr = res.a1;
> >       |                       ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:102:26: error: invalid use of undefined
> > type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> >   102 |                 target[i].midr = res.a1;
> >       |                          ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:103:23: error: invalid use of undefined
> > type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> >   103 |                 target[i].revidr = res.a2;
> >       |                       ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:103:26: error: invalid use of undefined
> > type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> >   103 |                 target[i].revidr = res.a2;
> >       |                          ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:104:23: error: invalid use of undefined
> > type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> >   104 |                 target[i].aidr = res.a3;
> >       |                       ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:104:26: error: invalid use of undefined
> > type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> >   104 |                 target[i].aidr = res.a3;
> >       |                          ^
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:107:14: error: implicit declaration of
> > function 'cpu_errata_set_target_impl' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> >   107 |         if (!cpu_errata_set_target_impl(max_cpus, target)) {
> >       |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c:116:37: error: invalid application of
> > 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct target_impl_cpu'
> >   116 |         memblock_free(target, sizeof(*target) * max_cpus);
> >       |                                     ^
> > 
> > Caused by commit
> > 
> >   86edf6bdcf05 ("smccc/kvm_guest: Enable errata based on implementation
> > CPUs")
> > 
> > I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20250305 for today.
> 
> Thanks for reporting this.
> 
> Hmm..kvm_guest.c gets build through HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY 
> which is selected by ARM_GIC_V3.
> 
> We could limit the kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init() to ARM64 to fix this
> like below as these hypercall is only supported for KVM/ARM64.
> 
> Or is there a better way to handle this?
> 
> Thanks,
> Shameer
> 
> ---8---
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
> b/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
> index 2f03b582c298..5767aed25cdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ bool kvm_arm_hyp_service_available(u32 func_id)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_arm_hyp_service_available);
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
>  void  __init kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init(void)
>  {
>         int i;
> @@ -115,3 +116,4 @@ void  __init kvm_arm_target_impl_cpu_init(void)
>  mem_free:
>         memblock_free(target, sizeof(*target) * max_cpus);
>  }
> +#endif

Yeah, that's probably best for now.

Oliver, do you mind stashing this on top so that -next can build
again? We can revisit this and have a better solution down the line.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Oliver Upton]

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 12:00:15AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Oliver, do you mind stashing this on top so that -next can build
> again? We can revisit this and have a better solution down the line.

Done -- finally caught a break to open my laptop today.

Thanks,
Oliver

linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 603 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
failed like this:

In file included from util/../../arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h:201,
                 from util/arm-spe.c:37:
tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h:132:10: fatal error: asm/sysreg-defs.h: No such file or directory
  132 | #include "asm/sysreg-defs.h"
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Caused by commit

  6a4c6c6a56c1 ("KVM: arm64: selftests: Import automatic generation of sysreg defs")

I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20231004 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Oliver Upton]

Hi Stephen,

On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 12:31:59PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
> failed like this:
> 
> In file included from util/../../arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h:201,
>                  from util/arm-spe.c:37:
> tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h:132:10: fatal error: asm/sysreg-defs.h: No such file or directory
>   132 | #include "asm/sysreg-defs.h"
>       |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Gah, shame on me, I didn't build everything in tools/ after this change.

> Caused by commit
> 
>   6a4c6c6a56c1 ("KVM: arm64: selftests: Import automatic generation of sysreg defs")
> 
> I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20231004 for today.

Thanks much, I'll back this out from the kvmarm side of things until we
get it sorted.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 510 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
failed like this:

Sphinx parallel build error:
docutils.utils.SystemMessage: /home/sfr/next/next/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst:6175: (SEVERE/4) Title level inconsistent:

For arm/arm64:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Caused by commit

  bfbab4456877 ("KVM: arm64: Implement PSCI SYSTEM_SUSPEND")

I have applied the following patch for today (I don't  know if it is
correct, but it does build).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1411 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Thu, 5 May 2022 20:10:05 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> failed like this:
> 
> Sphinx parallel build error:
> docutils.utils.SystemMessage: /home/sfr/next/next/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst:6175: (SEVERE/4) Title level inconsistent:
> 
> For arm/arm64:
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   bfbab4456877 ("KVM: arm64: Implement PSCI SYSTEM_SUSPEND")
> 
> I have applied the following patch for today (I don't  know if it is
> correct, but it does build).

oops :-)

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 20:06:34 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "VM: arm64: Implement PSCI SYSTEM_SUSPEND"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index deeb95dabc64..e5d685d4de11 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -6173,7 +6173,7 @@ Valid values for 'type' are:
    the VM.
 
 For arm/arm64:
-^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+--------------
 
    KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SUSPEND exits are enabled with the
    KVM_CAP_ARM_SYSTEM_SUSPEND VM capability. If a guest invokes the PSCI
-- 
2.35.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Marc Zyngier]

On 2022-05-05 11:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Thu, 5 May 2022 20:10:05 +1000 Stephen Rothwell 
> <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> 
>> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
>> failed like this:
>> 
>> Sphinx parallel build error:
>> docutils.utils.SystemMessage: 
>> /home/sfr/next/next/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst:6175: (SEVERE/4) 
>> Title level inconsistent:
>> 
>> For arm/arm64:
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> 
>> Caused by commit
>> 
>>   bfbab4456877 ("KVM: arm64: Implement PSCI SYSTEM_SUSPEND")
>> 
>> I have applied the following patch for today (I don't  know if it is
>> correct, but it does build).
> 
> oops :-)
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 20:06:34 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "VM: arm64: Implement PSCI SYSTEM_SUSPEND"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst 
> b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index deeb95dabc64..e5d685d4de11 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -6173,7 +6173,7 @@ Valid values for 'type' are:
>     the VM.
> 
>  For arm/arm64:
> -^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +--------------
> 
>     KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SUSPEND exits are enabled with the
>     KVM_CAP_ARM_SYSTEM_SUSPEND VM capability. If a guest invokes the 
> PSCI
> --
> 2.35.1

Thanks, I've taken this patch in my branch.

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:

tmp/cc9rCfjd.s: Assembler messages:
tmp/cc9rCfjd.s:310: Error: bad or missing co-processor number -- `mcr "mrc","mcr","p15, 0, r2, c12, c12, 3",u32'
scripts/Makefile.build:290: recipe for target 'drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.o' failed

Maybe caused by commit

  4f2546384150 ("ARM: Move system register accessors to asm/cp15.h")

I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20160922 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Marc Zyngier]

On 23/09/16 04:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> tmp/cc9rCfjd.s: Assembler messages:
> tmp/cc9rCfjd.s:310: Error: bad or missing co-processor number -- `mcr "mrc","mcr","p15, 0, r2, c12, c12, 3",u32'
> scripts/Makefile.build:290: recipe for target 'drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.o' failed
> 
> Maybe caused by commit
> 
>   4f2546384150 ("ARM: Move system register accessors to asm/cp15.h")
> 
> I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20160922 for today.

Ouch. This comes from 91ef844 ("irqchip/gic-v3: Reset BPR during
initialization") which has introduced a new accessor that doesn't get
converted by Vladimir's patch. My own fault.

This can be fixed-up by adding this to Vladimir's patch:

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
index 996848e..809f3be 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
@@ -216,6 +216,15 @@ static inline void gic_write_sre(u32 val)
 	isb();
 }
 
+static inline void gic_write_bpr1(u32 val)
+{
+#ifndef __write_sysreg
+	asm volatile("mcr " __stringify(ICC_BPR1) : : "r" (val));
+#else
+	write_sysreg(val, ICC_BPR1);
+#endif
+}
+
 /*
  * Even in 32bit systems that use LPAE, there is no guarantee that the I/O
  * interface provides true 64bit atomic accesses, so using strd/ldrd doesn't

but that'll create a minor conflict.

Another possibility is to put Vladimir's series on the backburner until
tip/irq/core gets in, and bring it back at this time. I'd prefer the
first solution, as it gives a bit more exposure to the code...

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 625 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:

arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c: In function 'kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier':
arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c:493:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'kvm_vcpu_request_scan_ioapic' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  kvm_vcpu_request_scan_ioapic(kvm);
  ^

Probably caused by commit 0ba09511ddc3 ("KVM: EVENTFD: remove inclusion
of irq.h").

I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20140919 for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Eric Auger]

Dear all,

Thanks Stephen for reporting the problem. Indeed removing irq.h header
file is no more possible since commit
c77dcacb397519b6ade8f08201a4a90a7f4f751e, "KVM: Move more code under
CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD" which moves among other things
kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier and kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier in
eventfd.c.

including virt/kvm/ioapic.h might fix the problem but I am OoO next week
and cannot investigate further right now.

Please can you remove that commit. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Best Regards

Eric


On 09/22/2014 06:06 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c: In function 'kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier':
> arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c:493:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'kvm_vcpu_request_scan_ioapic' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   kvm_vcpu_request_scan_ioapic(kvm);
>   ^
> 
> Probably caused by commit 0ba09511ddc3 ("KVM: EVENTFD: remove inclusion
> of irq.h").
> 
> I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20140919 for today.
> 

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Eric Auger]

On 09/22/2014 07:07 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> Thanks Stephen for reporting the problem. Indeed removing irq.h header
> file is no more possible since commit
> c77dcacb397519b6ade8f08201a4a90a7f4f751e, "KVM: Move more code under
> CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD" which moves among other things
> kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier and kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier in
> eventfd.c.

Hi,

kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier and kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier were
already included in Paul's patch,
commit e4d57e1ee1ab59f0cef0272800ac6c52e0ec814a, KVM: Move irq notifier
implementation into eventfd.c and just moved in above patch.

So I completely missed this ioapic function.

You can remove my commit. No commit does depend on it yet.

Thanks

Eric
> 
> including virt/kvm/ioapic.h might fix the problem but I am OoO next week
> and cannot investigate further right now.
> 
> Please can you remove that commit. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> On 09/22/2014 06:06 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
>> failed like this:
>>
>> arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c: In function 'kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier':
>> arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c:493:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'kvm_vcpu_request_scan_ioapic' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>   kvm_vcpu_request_scan_ioapic(kvm);
>>   ^
>>
>> Probably caused by commit 0ba09511ddc3 ("KVM: EVENTFD: remove inclusion
>> of irq.h").
>>
>> I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20140919 for today.
>>
> 

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Paolo Bonzini]

Il 22/09/2014 21:46, Christoffer Dall ha scritto:
> 
> I've taken a stab at fixing this properly, can you have a quick look and
> let me know if you prefer this or if I should just revert the commit?
> 
> https://git.linaro.org/people/christoffer.dall/linux-kvm-arm.git/commit/3d2603609f2adaae85dd1ef9884270331ec120e3

I think you should include ioapic.h (under #ifdef __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC as
in your patch), not irq.h.  However, I haven't compiled it. Please send
the patch for inclusion in my tree, and I'll fix the conflict when I
pull from you.

Paolo

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 783 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:06:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c: In function 'kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier':
> arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c:493:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'kvm_vcpu_request_scan_ioapic' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   kvm_vcpu_request_scan_ioapic(kvm);
>   ^
> 
> Probably caused by commit 0ba09511ddc3 ("KVM: EVENTFD: remove inclusion
> of irq.h").
> 
> I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20140919 for today.

Still getting this failure.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Christoffer Dall]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1143 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 04:50:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:06:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> > 
> > arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c: In function 'kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier':
> > arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c:493:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'kvm_vcpu_request_scan_ioapic' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >   kvm_vcpu_request_scan_ioapic(kvm);
> >   ^
> > 
> > Probably caused by commit 0ba09511ddc3 ("KVM: EVENTFD: remove inclusion
> > of irq.h").
> > 
> > I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20140919 for today.
> 
> Still getting this failure.
> 
Commit e9142e3b69c2ae8a699463e219e5b029ff0d652b in kvm/queue fixes this,
but it hasn't gone to next yet.

Paolo, I know there's a scary commit in queue but there's a bunch of
scary stuff in the kvmarm/next too that I'd like to see in next, any
chance you can put a subset of queue into next?

Thanks,
-Christoffer

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree

[Paolo Bonzini]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Il 24/09/2014 09:06, Christoffer Dall ha scritto:
>>> Still getting this failure.
>>> 
> Commit e9142e3b69c2ae8a699463e219e5b029ff0d652b in kvm/queue fixes
> this, but it hasn't gone to next yet.
> 
> Paolo, I know there's a scary commit in queue but there's a bunch
> of scary stuff in the kvmarm/next too that I'd like to see in next,
> any chance you can put a subset of queue into next?

Yes, I will put the commit in next and rebase queue on top of it.

Paolo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUIpdYAAoJEBvWZb6bTYbyAkwP/jwno7pOt/sHUaa+p45Uouse
oFS2aej8ZVLz3LMy6KjFuIME1bJjQytIZrFaGn+UksGd6cfhECydVO8hlJxWUDbc
PrWpnwzX/u4sorewmX+hq9EoFBfIEzC86NyrUaujiL6ojLjoJ4mkoRc9LRCm/K7j
dPJFGEQqifs0HelWSQPxH4ei/YyHk/TcaKgepQGlG4Aw/crLHmEajbrnGLge7isW
H/EtBW5iJToG8mxB+ipSwFCADUkXC+FUrEblX5Nxma/949roXg8LPuZUBxCxWwyr
Voi5/lU1sZMRYixoCHhhKaWPDfoSspjPU4JNEUMj4qtrZrBD9W27+bjyQBTdLjU7
erI1pQCmZsU52RdAtZiUBuSbRxb8is+WlRHJy7dhlb+SBcgXNWw/k9sxV2U6PZ+T
Z4A0ngZM12ZTd6XWgiE+3mMR0XGBsjh7TYq+ybQReCgKeNy/Q3FL6fS4E9me7MWF
CWIfqV327GYfH/eU8Bd1/VHGEZfDefDXZrdANa+A5FhaGTLIZbPHfEo2BCc85LhS
RRlKjIg1LeByCHDRaQ8parl0xgZRLuENfHn5gso4ZsAKgLyUp8IIGanxH8GD2sRO
F2AtAFfLSlXUo/FsxaW0bQOxnBB9L/UX5QmMT/YwG7QoP97Wa4fDBV1ruHTiJ9SO
s/nkZE3pcbAFSv/0rXlG
=ln4T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----