Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kunit-next tree with the apparmor tree

Shuah Khan
2022-12-12T18:03:59Z

On 12/12/22 10:52, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 12/8/22 13:10, John Johansen wrote:
>> On 12/7/22 18:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the kunit-next tree got a conflict in:
>>>
>>>    security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
>>>
>>> between commits:
>>>
>>>    371e50a0b19f ("apparmor: make unpack_array return a trianary value")
>>>    73c7e91c8bc9 ("apparmor: Remove unnecessary size check when unpacking trans_table")
>>>    217af7e2f4de ("apparmor: refactor profile rules and attachments")
>>> (and probably others)
>>>
>>> from the apparmor tree and commit:
>>>
>>>    2c92044683f5 ("apparmor: test: make static symbols visible during kunit testing")
>>>
>>> from the kunit-next tree.
>>>
>>> This is somewhat of a mess ... pity there is not a shared branch (or
>>> better routing if the patches).
>>>
>> sorry, there was a miscommunication/misunderstanding, probably all on me, I
>> thought the kunit stuff that is conflicting here was going to merge next
>> cycle.
>>
>

How about I just drop the following for now and handle this in the next cycle?
I think it might be least confusing option. Let me know. I can just do that
and then send pull request in a day or tow once things settle down in next.

2c92044683f5 ("apparmor: test: make static symbols visible during kunit testing")

thanks,
-- Shuah