From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66C7938DC0; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 07:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b="EizVZI9+"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="S8TMmgL1" Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368A13200B21; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 02:37:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Jan 2024 02:37:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1704872276; x=1704958676; bh=9wkDRQh6pF FKUXGsU4Ant2stj6MA5eYv8VwCd+J8M4g=; b=EizVZI9+THloNiP6QFH9F3BR6i Pt+D3ruiLPekF/vwc+I0992Dh+A4ps7yM/edsEqX6wFEhm9CV06d2dnqsbfwG8kt 2+MVR0cbw/eTE5hcy5SxNSSHR/jJhU/0+jTE6Jtzlc7TjcT5yKsE1HRn2fWUH4Uw t3g0ohsiosQdLzYG4gvac2RPHblBvV0rNHm73ADYVQf7FZU+L9rvjejTGtuFM5nh epIStmMNRqn8gNDoKQ3VoSGPMtrXnJWEg9sG4FeQQT1RGMAc6p+E94la9XPgJLIQ 3kzHItOdm6qXxEbpbjm7O59UIgzhJnQgm+LHEiS9iu8sQfDBnKiAIwaEq0ug== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1704872276; x=1704958676; bh=9wkDRQh6pFFKUXGsU4Ant2stj6MA 5eYv8VwCd+J8M4g=; b=S8TMmgL1glDm7J7wIXXbSpAM12cRTah6GJkpxVEeYMao It+lVaxyw+JNOxqw9qWrGAldwoNF0uYBKPQ08Yrjerpc9JWDdwl28BqHgleMcSUh uv1ZDV3mC5Aym1ostbuVj8wB8blbsgTdtlyV8tvAwmpNg2gwbsWrTsg1+ktnpzdB sgA7FzVtT7/KFyF+dk0k+XphOBnCN1LVhWfdD86wyFxJmxA0X8/3o/SZ60YQnFGb ThK3NfH136+Vbp8Khh8F9MCAHfrRK5pxBkUpFcnJPzweAaQants85VY/C54zsZFw un6HP4sNBsZse6b/UTLtGjv4JSElUdEnMe0CVRewDw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrvdeitddguddtlecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdet rhhnugcuuegvrhhgmhgrnhhnfdcuoegrrhhnugesrghrnhgusgdruggvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeffheeugeetiefhgeethfejgfdtuefggeejleehjeeutefhfeeggefhkedt keetffenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe grrhhnugesrghrnhgusgdruggv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 404E8B6008F; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 02:37:56 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-1364-ga51d5fd3b7-fm-20231219.001-ga51d5fd3 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20240110083442.6728646c@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20240110083442.6728646c@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:37:35 +0100 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Stephen Rothwell" Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , linux-next Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the asm-generic tree Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Jan 9, 2024, at 22:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit > (but the same patch): > > e8cf41b96bc9 ("asm-generic: make sparse happy with odd-sized > put_unaligned_*()") > > This is commit > > 1ab33c03145d ("asm-generic: make sparse happy with odd-sized > put_unaligned_*()") > > in Linus' tree. I ropped mine now, thanks for the report. It was still on top of the branch, so I'll just send the pull request without this one. Arnd