* linux-next: duplicate patch in the paulmck tree
@ 2024-08-05 4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-05 14:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2024-08-05 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 353 bytes --]
Hi all,
The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):
88b4d7bfe7c2 ("clocksource: Fix brown-bag boolean thinko in cs_watchdog_read()")
This is commit
f2655ac2c06a ("clocksource: Fix brown-bag boolean thinko in cs_watchdog_read()")
in Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the paulmck tree
2024-08-05 4:57 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2024-08-05 14:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2024-08-05 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 02:57:14PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following commit is also in Linus Torvalds' tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
>
> 88b4d7bfe7c2 ("clocksource: Fix brown-bag boolean thinko in cs_watchdog_read()")
>
> This is commit
>
> f2655ac2c06a ("clocksource: Fix brown-bag boolean thinko in cs_watchdog_read()")
>
> in Linus' tree.
Thank you, and I will drop my copy.
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* linux-next: duplicate patch in the paulmck tree
@ 2024-10-17 7:23 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-17 13:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2024-10-17 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney, Vineet Gupta
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 351 bytes --]
Hi all,
The following commit is also in the arc-current tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):
8b5e6986360f ("ARC: Use __force to suppress per-CPU cmpxchg complaints")
This is commit
bb5d272ed94d ("ARC: build: Use __force to suppress per-CPU cmpxchg warnings")
in the arc-current tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the paulmck tree
2024-10-17 7:23 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2024-10-17 13:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2024-10-17 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Vineet Gupta, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 06:23:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following commit is also in the arc-current tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
>
> 8b5e6986360f ("ARC: Use __force to suppress per-CPU cmpxchg complaints")
>
> This is commit
>
> bb5d272ed94d ("ARC: build: Use __force to suppress per-CPU cmpxchg warnings")
>
> in the arc-current tree.
Excellent news, thank you! I will remove mine from -rcu.
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* linux-next: duplicate patch in the paulmck tree
@ 2025-04-28 8:08 Stephen Rothwell
2025-04-28 14:30 ` Boqun Feng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2025-04-28 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney, Frederic Weisbecker, Neeraj Upadhyay,
Boqun Feng, Uladzislau Rezki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 358 bytes --]
Hi all,
The following commit is also in the rcu tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):
5c9e0062989e ("tools/memory-model/Documentation: Fix SRCU section in explanation.txt")
This is commit
8e40035aab95 ("tools/memory-model/Documentation: Fix SRCU section in explanation.txt")
in the rcu tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the paulmck tree
2025-04-28 8:08 linux-next: duplicate patch in the paulmck tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2025-04-28 14:30 ` Boqun Feng
2025-04-28 15:18 ` Uladzislau Rezki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Boqun Feng @ 2025-04-28 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Paul E. McKenney, Frederic Weisbecker, Neeraj Upadhyay,
Uladzislau Rezki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, Joel Fernandes
[Cc Joel]
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 06:08:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following commit is also in the rcu tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
>
> 5c9e0062989e ("tools/memory-model/Documentation: Fix SRCU section in explanation.txt")
>
> This is commit
>
> 8e40035aab95 ("tools/memory-model/Documentation: Fix SRCU section in explanation.txt")
>
> in the rcu tree.
>
@Joel, should we drop this commit from rcu?
Regards,
Boqun
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the paulmck tree
2025-04-28 14:30 ` Boqun Feng
@ 2025-04-28 15:18 ` Uladzislau Rezki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Uladzislau Rezki @ 2025-04-28 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Boqun Feng, Paul E. McKenney
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Paul E. McKenney, Frederic Weisbecker,
Neeraj Upadhyay, Uladzislau Rezki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, Joel Fernandes
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 07:30:26AM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
> [Cc Joel]
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 06:08:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The following commit is also in the rcu tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> >
> > 5c9e0062989e ("tools/memory-model/Documentation: Fix SRCU section in explanation.txt")
> >
> > This is commit
> >
> > 8e40035aab95 ("tools/memory-model/Documentation: Fix SRCU section in explanation.txt")
> >
> > in the rcu tree.
> >
>
> @Joel, should we drop this commit from rcu?
>
IMO, it should be dropped from the RCU tree as soon as it is from
another kernel part.
Paul was about to deliver this via another track. But it can be that
plans have been changed.
--
Uladzislau Rezki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-28 15:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-28 8:08 linux-next: duplicate patch in the paulmck tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-04-28 14:30 ` Boqun Feng
2025-04-28 15:18 ` Uladzislau Rezki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-17 7:23 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-17 13:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-08-05 4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-05 14:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).