From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BEDC623; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 09:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745831391; cv=none; b=mphsys6V72iqODYE+U1xY3/do4mRRNQi+a1Vm6gX0MBcY3/Y5LCPxtvxLg4Wl0jqM9RwkVts461nBq0ovz+fjRzXnoh9ejwH5Vbi1d0/6lxL8dYtgwXwduznVQtPST/8ckgnzKlTdqRPLdNSvDrzrS63tzqxbR5E2iZUYZQkSg8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745831391; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rY+UFh2mz9StRqBuhvYZkB1m2wM/4EduU8ucCaIo+mg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AeCe877B+7lIWrxBMPfznPdk//iTmnoEHPtuMzdt5wOI9m9aO6BefjBaKSF/DRGbOkB67S7mvo4f38SWEuOouQ7QbUFRT9ejuGt5AKr84CevC+1PvWGFkwEtOsHc0TCgRTiitHFT6gUE3bH71OJciZlO8hBsoHVfzlTA7pD7lY4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oY+VVALh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oY+VVALh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 097B2C4CEE4; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 09:09:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1745831391; bh=rY+UFh2mz9StRqBuhvYZkB1m2wM/4EduU8ucCaIo+mg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oY+VVALhFod+AQ+no6rO6ikw6g5zDhGyRf07asd8wnHfvSNxE8XrGSzvw5kasWWY/ M1BEoJn3FcsxI4EPh9+7qvgBBwRyBKIqKmVoTWHq/EPsfV6pFQVA9wxcd4O7pqj1e/ MQspdB/0keW3RtFflUKKG/0J21KD5VlrSLyWb+Njlst5X876ofWM5iktW5CE5zpeWc Sd8L6JH/NZ3BrYcbUtKhg2Ql7RgGJYKpzXvyxSVoe4bYiLnNFqPEG7JLBuUene72Io PwV6m6iDAVDDgj0oovuEFB/qEljn32oMLH8Rvwxy1PCpXClY5MOboE1yWoXy0OXmwo RLRrLWkIXPPsQ== Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 11:09:47 +0200 From: Danilo Krummrich To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Asahi Lina , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-nova tree Message-ID: References: <20250428142436.4579b115@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250428142436.4579b115@canb.auug.org.au> Hi Stephen, On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 02:24:36PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the drm-nova tree, today's linux-next build (KCONFIG_NAME) > failed like this: > > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: vmlinux.o: in function `rust_helper_drm_gem_object_put': > (.text+0x1b6cd15): undefined reference to `drm_gem_object_free' > > Caused by commit > > be8d1a24798f ("rust: drm: gem: Add GEM object abstraction") > > I have used the drm-nova tree from next-20250414 for today. This issue was caused by rust/helpers/drm.c not having the required CONFIG_DRM guards. This is now fixed in nova-next; sorry for the inconvenience. - Danilo