From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 670A6235063; Fri, 16 May 2025 12:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747399529; cv=none; b=ICjgqjDQUiKO+To/S/ZrXgZOgQuY2yYgJT0w7AUcuL8n1alOLPVXkzKk4fh1PYPdSfNyeM7A33vqQG70BhMpnvsYnPJj3Rr7yEC5utGspqI9+2DUSwPhNzrsW5SOYT4RJJYeJnwrKPsRw+dzjtLlhizX87gnCV1NAoj15dNq6jw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747399529; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HN/cEFYSAkwYOh3KG420fFqyI8rF0kMcULOE6KLhcdM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iWKKGHneYZFxui2nPNs4sgqcAxR+3aezbtWsl0KfVUAigeeNVmlUoU4EcSOmwpab6A0pyISOsxCZQS2D4wtbhIZWbEdZYF49gpRrKq6fPy5gZrB5lsyKlENsL+vvaoNEAZiBOnORJENUZP3mPFtj59WfgKaPIjBpr0oKfc9Z17Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OuPRmAst; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OuPRmAst" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8198EC4CEE4; Fri, 16 May 2025 12:45:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747399528; bh=HN/cEFYSAkwYOh3KG420fFqyI8rF0kMcULOE6KLhcdM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OuPRmAstxD0Rub9/WaCDOIHCdajRGj6CPPaIRkt5DvfGDVSFutxEH8RjkbnqnEJm8 0N0rPUk5jK0pZNsEA3vidfUQFY+3TQZSvcybub7R1hJW88ipKNjvu5aebIRqr9+zOy XloQ733qM7MAYAc81yQcUX+VFFmPX+dstOgpSiCK8G4RW2fEhnsjXX1GK4qRn91TX3 63FeIoa4AGqg2W+8NisUtR4O6g0r04q/Z/vMyFvS/wybLoWtEvT5WYJrk7WOaE+cTg P90OyVWkggwcKgoxY+w9p3nmqjqJ3XOJJmqkPD1GjdlKmoDxY1rHGrN6fDPpXZomCp JHLfSRDidozRw== Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 14:45:23 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Ahmed S. Darwish" , Artem Bityutskiy , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree Message-ID: References: <20250516161541.0cff29b8@canb.auug.org.au> <20250516195446.1331ac06@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250516195446.1331ac06@canb.auug.org.au> * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > On Fri, 16 May 2025 09:54:35 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > So I don't think the change is needed - the header still > > fully exists: > > > > starship:~/tip> ls -lh arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 mingo mingo 6.1K May 16 09:34 arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 mingo mingo 149 May 16 09:34 arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h > > That change is in the tip tree and involved in the conflict, so I > just used it as it was in the tip tree. This is normal conflict > resolution. Yeah, indeed. I was somehow under the impression that there was a build failure - but there wasn't. It all looks good, sorry about the noise! Thanks, Ingo