From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C08F930CDA8; Wed, 27 Aug 2025 17:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756315578; cv=none; b=uQ/pPfV0fWyDvORXQ9ufiQ5pghKhxhf8x3xLzviSrfuYgLflNtudGSb/pi34k3Kz7LGes52fbJviyi5tMdqXI5DkZuBgxfN5GPc8cxMTdJXv7pkz6GLxqKtb2UKH4wVAlkUrriPqznaIs8g6/K9/jlG77Hd+hDGxGI7lj/AI6dg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756315578; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n9DnZifmjjR/lsd2ag9tVatg0zcJwZgYkw52UdyN7PA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bkmV01Qrovs0jQrXkhuWvSaLEupRHhwqrS/zps4IS0FlcBSIUDJNzasCEXn5MARj6vrtHQMXj8EOQgXq5JL9w3YXlTFgmvRawvM2/BZ+oW3ZWsamhfy/WuJqzs7iZK4wY5ED3a2fX9TDebUaBxirE92kBNT/n7odRrvs2h9ucQc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=X7DTS/Wi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="X7DTS/Wi" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DD5DC4CEF0; Wed, 27 Aug 2025 17:26:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1756315578; bh=n9DnZifmjjR/lsd2ag9tVatg0zcJwZgYkw52UdyN7PA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=X7DTS/Wig2P7M2VUD1GR6NRpapIb2G8ux6Pk5r61b325I82VIZFPTqurlGx+Wf69k nW5gh+4kYZYnyyC/CBysVmG+TWpN9Sd6Fx/O8vJ5H75bvIo3F6t4shVYY9+bmGobol 5P8/MnbdcoBChV/8ZHw+TPbByHyoGV0OqMbYTXJEk26Mk2jIvh0ijbSm92t9vjwBlJ 1uXeeyCVHcfM9eFe1DCAxiqU9t7/q/navGV1xD81g8+Tr16bSbmAZDIq6g4d5VmZ55 DELy2aQav2hbf0GfxD/zUHoHsqPvvmgcAuGTFo7MpNA9uvNQ2F+Q2Q1KIn6+VGR0Xm IiB2uiokCkGRQ== Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 10:26:16 -0700 From: Namhyung Kim To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vhost tree Message-ID: References: <20250827124654.78881028@canb.auug.org.au> <20250827062218-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250827062218-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Hello, On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 06:23:52AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:46:54PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The following commit is also in the perf-current tree as a different > > commit (but the same patch): > > > > c67e16d30dca ("tools headers: Sync uapi/linux/vhost.h with the kernel source" > > ) > > > > This is commit > > > > f79a62f4b3c7 ("tools headers: Sync uapi/linux/vhost.h with the kernel source") > > > > in the perf-current tree. > > > Hmm. I could drop mine I guess, but it only really makes sense after: > > vhost: Fix ioctl # for VHOST_[GS]ET_FORK_FROM_OWNER > > > which is not in the perf tree. Yep, so I was waiting for you to send PR with the fix. It seems you already removed the commit in your tree. I'll send a PR for perf tools with this change. Thanks, Namhyung