linux-next: manual merge of the xilinx tree with the ti tree

linux-next: manual merge of the xilinx tree with the ti tree

[Mark Brown]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the xilinx tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig

between commit:

  f69f88211c84d ("arm64: defconfig: Enable the J721E PCI host driver")

from the ti tree and commit:

  41de0de8033e7 ("arm64: defconfig: Enable missing AMD/Xilinx drivers")

from the xilinx tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index c46c678c8f6c2,cdb7d69e3b248..0000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@@ -233,10 -231,12 +233,14 @@@ CONFIG_PCIE_MEDIATEK_GEN3=
  CONFIG_PCI_TEGRA=y
  CONFIG_PCIE_RCAR_HOST=y
  CONFIG_PCIE_RCAR_EP=y
 +CONFIG_PCIE_RENESAS_RZG3S_HOST=y
  CONFIG_PCIE_ROCKCHIP_HOST=m
  CONFIG_PCI_XGENE=y
 +CONFIG_PCI_J721E_HOST=m
+ CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX=y
+ CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX_DMA_PL=y
+ CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX_NWL=y
+ CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX_CPM=y
  CONFIG_PCI_IMX6_HOST=y
  CONFIG_PCI_LAYERSCAPE=y
  CONFIG_PCI_HISI=y
@@@ -608,11 -609,11 +618,13 @@@ CONFIG_SPI_STM32_OSPI=
  CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
  CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA210_QUAD=m
  CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=m
+ CONFIG_SPI_XILINX=m
+ CONFIG_SPI_ZYNQMP_GQSPI=m
  CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV=m
  CONFIG_SPMI=y
 +CONFIG_SPMI_APPLE=m
  CONFIG_SPMI_MTK_PMIF=m
 +CONFIG_PINCTRL_APPLE_GPIO=m
  CONFIG_PINCTRL_BRCMSTB=y
  CONFIG_PINCTRL_BCM2712=y
  CONFIG_PINCTRL_DA9062=m

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xilinx tree with the ti tree

[Michal Simek]

Hi Mark, +Arnd

On 1/19/26 16:14, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the xilinx tree got a conflict in:
> 
>    arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>    f69f88211c84d ("arm64: defconfig: Enable the J721E PCI host driver")
> 
> from the ti tree and commit:
> 
>    41de0de8033e7 ("arm64: defconfig: Enable missing AMD/Xilinx drivers")
> 
> from the xilinx tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> index c46c678c8f6c2,cdb7d69e3b248..0000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> @@@ -233,10 -231,12 +233,14 @@@ CONFIG_PCIE_MEDIATEK_GEN3=
>    CONFIG_PCI_TEGRA=y
>    CONFIG_PCIE_RCAR_HOST=y
>    CONFIG_PCIE_RCAR_EP=y
>   +CONFIG_PCIE_RENESAS_RZG3S_HOST=y
>    CONFIG_PCIE_ROCKCHIP_HOST=m
>    CONFIG_PCI_XGENE=y
>   +CONFIG_PCI_J721E_HOST=m
> + CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX=y
> + CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX_DMA_PL=y
> + CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX_NWL=y
> + CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX_CPM=y
>    CONFIG_PCI_IMX6_HOST=y
>    CONFIG_PCI_LAYERSCAPE=y
>    CONFIG_PCI_HISI=y
> @@@ -608,11 -609,11 +618,13 @@@ CONFIG_SPI_STM32_OSPI=
>    CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
>    CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA210_QUAD=m
>    CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=m
> + CONFIG_SPI_XILINX=m
> + CONFIG_SPI_ZYNQMP_GQSPI=m
>    CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV=m
>    CONFIG_SPMI=y
>   +CONFIG_SPMI_APPLE=m
>    CONFIG_SPMI_MTK_PMIF=m
>   +CONFIG_PINCTRL_APPLE_GPIO=m
>    CONFIG_PINCTRL_BRCMSTB=y
>    CONFIG_PINCTRL_BCM2712=y
>    CONFIG_PINCTRL_DA9062=m


I have sent merge request to Arnd today. My 2 patches are in Linux-next for a 
while that's why it is new change coming from that second tree.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/patch/CAHTX3dJDXwA-y-DaJbM4x+UEBJvwhCr_xz4xGf0kF7_8ufvNWQ@mail.gmail.com/

Arnd: please be aware.

Thanks,
Michal

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xilinx tree with the ti tree

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 329 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 04:17:46PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:

> I have sent merge request to Arnd today. My 2 patches are in Linux-next for
> a while that's why it is new change coming from that second tree.

The merge order is fixed so it's just a question of which tree was
already merged which shows as the conflicting tree.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xilinx tree with the ti tree

[Nishanth Menon]

On 15:21-20260119, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 04:17:46PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> 
> > I have sent merge request to Arnd today. My 2 patches are in Linux-next for
> > a while that's why it is new change coming from that second tree.
> 
> The merge order is fixed so it's just a question of which tree was
> already merged which shows as the conflicting tree.

Thanks Michal, Mark,

Yep, I did anticipate a minor conflict here - headsup: I have had to
squash patches today based on additional comments, but the conflict
resolution should be the same. Will add the note in my merge request.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
https://ti.com/opensource