From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C085263C8F; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 21:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769205370; cv=none; b=HBh/PMWQ8oRiB1whsNiSqbgD9XSibq4wLrw4z3njF97wuHlJ1HoHni992jBB3IOiXZBrd4SheNm/V3blPPH7I0HHD7CDYce4sd2+KEzftF4IEMprp31YuCLpPUqJO7+9HHY28/7T3C4KFsefgzt7rWzmU3v7XxRHWHe057vxc3A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769205370; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sPOcBCqn/5JwUYE+zeznvFjH3BB7yj/c6pbdHknf75s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OA1LmZp9cqwBDrhyrHVgVMSmka9U9MjtVMsMN1p5cat1eRRFlDe/IkTBTvtSf9gpGibzNgKF+ACzau1xqEr34jCYj5hUMeSHSPmIXkx2tQTWAMCw+p+VrWPIclcAZNFb/7vEIthzFY5sJNEKvoxx4olJeRsUt2hcEMymZX175yg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hjzXZz7H; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hjzXZz7H" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1769205369; x=1800741369; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=sPOcBCqn/5JwUYE+zeznvFjH3BB7yj/c6pbdHknf75s=; b=hjzXZz7HTxGsOnneHN/E/cq7ZlfIuI0Dh3jbSMxwL9tDQGutDTRy3SpF YJYa6JMv4m3TbPgt4qpLS4AFV5JQHmteyDiRD1Rl/TUb6Xwsr1gP40lhc ayzeFj21/nwf308I4oDrla42ghhWgr/26HWINEGfp6R3rGAW8AgnN0OcP Gdl0qfkJtqr6SQg154fy5eAG/5IJIMn1bP+JoCpQZEuSB0p7ryufMl1/O PAlyZdcXJWZkHiwM+DFVKpmQXZl48N65hJPf9RQ/VpHHT/57KV9fhTixa hfDvu22jYj4ctXuyMVqLz1kdrTluPT9778F2fHTFgQCEFiNHxRcQ2o4CM w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: e3mc5vImT2+ebuzMVBEAKw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: aKUkMVe+SX6CPXWlli2YmQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11680"; a="70550407" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,248,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="70550407" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2026 13:56:08 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +FwLtKxHSUespqFkVA8cEw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: pHLDgP/fS+6Hu4YK/7G1hA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,248,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="207552958" Received: from rvuia-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.112]) by fmviesa009-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2026 13:56:06 -0800 Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 23:56:04 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Mark Brown Cc: Theodore Ts'o , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the random tree Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 09:48:19PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the random tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/smp.h:119, > from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/lockdep.h:14, > from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/spinlock.h:63, > from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/sched.h:37, > from /tmp/next/build/arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.c:13: > /tmp/next/build/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h:73:43: warning: 'struct completion' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration > 73 | extern int register_ipi_completion(struct completion *completion, int cpu); > | ^~~~~~~~~~ Thank you for the report. > Caused by commit > > cb2d25278d5ff (random: don't use "proxy" headers) > > I have used the tree from 20260122 instead. Wouldn't adding struct completion; at the top of arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h fix this? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko