From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 596F42D0622; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 22:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769206732; cv=none; b=Yuz9Rm1fSXzkXt5Er3e1PTUbsAK06apxK+znYIRWJd1sov3xZMkd2sq+O6CS12uFiPOy7KG4uoFAGq5KWYvw0nw43rkVLx0DCUxzWElQ4zRD23e1x4mPK1abU7RuhHcoupuDV15YR2xArT053buza1wY4fyTnRgjlxyAcv+2Lqw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769206732; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pqmwYUe4/taL5WoWyvwsr2cOrdKhKmDqH2eW2bxQuy4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZC8e1bsayWct7kWWL5vk7qwGPSbQSC8pGf9STZ2CXygPHNOHNvuc09uj/a1Obu9PmZDyle4sKAJswnkmy1KXU4yIvuCKoD3/3LlLlVMOYnJwztYiLPqrVXG8R28aX+PuQQDUplidGC9iDWrc6CBgKqeoBkx3vSQO1g9ar3yxSkA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bGJXiwBq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bGJXiwBq" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1769206730; x=1800742730; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=pqmwYUe4/taL5WoWyvwsr2cOrdKhKmDqH2eW2bxQuy4=; b=bGJXiwBqTCXZSxiSnszJ/Kqnr21ZvdFukyaowifT5W6zujiDKh04LXxY B8I2rAuVTEzOnOkdpUh3VAgxIgNUIKha7E0P+IGRzMapFhvJDn/7kX/rS Z2fq7rmLWJ3HDG8MlDLvu/D7ztspEQdVUJPnMr56+F3xgbYNwo+e6/DJV e6lgjUCnJvS5MQIw/7Y46pSOIEkAAQ7lnVpu7miVbVtLsCnuxPEIN5hLP h2zIWADfJm4YCWtzun/e1tqC/EoX2ouurJUmJUdaospkFtu1Ddb1gHgBu wM1kS/7xigr2kcA/oopLKJCZhNzea8wvmowBhQ70GHLjGctI1SWIt4/0p A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OciMD0LcS2at7b0kninEiQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Vu3RjPKqRkKBluTnSixgUw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11680"; a="70185197" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,249,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="70185197" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2026 14:18:49 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0WSoN+CBQ1KNr1klZzDCIQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 2xHxtXYdSNyYUvuVhHvJgQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,249,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="207172666" Received: from rvuia-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.112]) by orviesa008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2026 14:18:48 -0800 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 00:18:45 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Mark Brown Cc: Theodore Ts'o , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the random tree Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 10:10:56PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:56:04PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 09:48:19PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > After merging the random tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > /tmp/next/build/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h:73:43: warning: 'struct completion' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration > > > 73 | extern int register_ipi_completion(struct completion *completion, int cpu); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > > > Wouldn't adding > > > struct completion; > > > at the top of arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h fix this? > > That ougtht to do the bulk of it, though I see there's also at least: > > /tmp/next/build/include/linux/dma-fence.h: In function '__dma_fence_is_later': > /tmp/next/build/include/linux/dma-fence.h:501:22: error: implicit declaration of > function 'lower_32_bits' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 501 | return (int)(lower_32_bits(f1) - lower_32_bits(f2)) > 0; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ This (dma-fence.h) needs wordpart.h. > and > > In file included from /tmp/next/build/drivers/power/supply/tps65090-charger.c:10 > : > /tmp/next/build/include/linux/freezer.h: In function 'try_to_freeze': > /tmp/next/build/include/linux/freezer.h:58:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'might_sleep' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 58 | might_sleep(); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > in there. And this (freezer.h) for now requires kernel.h :-( ... Okay, I need to reproduce that. Thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko