From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Ashutosh Dixit" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>,
"Daniele Ceraolo Spurio" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"Matt Roper" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"Raag Jadav" <raag.jadav@intel.com>,
"Riana Tauro" <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the origin tree
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2026 22:47:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYkSZpjepGCh6ZGI@sirena.co.uk> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 994 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
between commit:
4cb1b327135ddd ("drm/xe/guc: Fix CFI violation in debugfs access.")
from the origin tree and commits:
43fb9e113bf11d ("drm/xe/gt: Introduce runtime suspend/resume")
6e035abf98b05f ("drm/xe/guc: Fix CFI violation in debugfs access.")
3947e482b5ebb9 ("drm/xe/guc: Use scope-based cleanup")
from the drm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
index edb939f2626851,6df7c3f260e5bd..00000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2026-02-08 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-08 22:47 Mark Brown [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-27 20:56 linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the origin tree Mark Brown
2026-03-23 15:55 Mark Brown
2026-03-23 15:55 Mark Brown
2026-03-23 15:49 Mark Brown
2026-03-23 15:01 Mark Brown
2026-02-08 22:46 Mark Brown
2026-02-02 14:29 Mark Brown
2026-01-19 17:03 Mark Brown
2026-01-19 16:53 Mark Brown
2025-10-02 12:07 Mark Brown
2025-10-02 12:05 Mark Brown
2025-10-02 12:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-26 12:38 Mark Brown
2024-06-28 16:51 Mark Brown
2024-06-27 15:06 Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYkSZpjepGCh6ZGI@sirena.co.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox