public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: Tree for Feb 23
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 23:04:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZzc6oc538KyTPUB@sirena.org.uk> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1843 bytes --]

Hi all,

Changes since 20260220:

The mm-nonmm-unstable tree acquired a conflict with the origin tree.

The drm-intel tree acquired a conflict with the origin tree.

The drm-xe tree acquired multiple conflicts with the origin tree.

The drm-xe tree acquired a conflict with the drm-misc tree.

Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 885
 828 files changed, 18023 insertions(+), 9574 deletions(-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
(patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/ ).  If you
are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull"
to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the
old one.  You should use "git fetch" and checkout or reset to the new
master.

You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
file in the source.  There is also the merge.log file in the Next
directory.  Between each merge, the tree was built with a defconfig
for arm64, an allmodconfig for x86_64, a multi_v7_defconfig for arm,
an arm64 build of various kselftests, a KUnit build and run on arm64,
and a native build of tools/perf.  After the final fixups (if any), I do
an x86_64 modules_install followed by builds for x86_64 allnoconfig,
arm64 allyesconfig, powerpc allnoconfig (32 and 64 bit),
ppc44x_defconfig and pseries_le_defconfig and i386, s390, sparc and
sparc64 defconfig and htmldocs.

Below is a summary of the state of the merge.

I am currently merging 405 trees (counting Linus' and 121 trees of bug
fix patches pending for the current release).

Stats about the size of the tree over time can be seen at
http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html .

Thanks to Paul Gortmaker for triage and bug fixes.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2026-02-23 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-23 23:04 Mark Brown [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-23  4:40 linux-next: Tree for Feb 23 Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-23  3:55 Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-23  8:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-02-23  9:27   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-24  1:44 broonie
2021-02-23  6:35 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-23  5:00 Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-23  5:01 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-23  3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-25  5:00 Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-23  3:37 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aZzc6oc538KyTPUB@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox