From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-fixes tree
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 13:47:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aara9fmCbTdROliH@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 880 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa.c
between commit:
89865e6dc8487 ("drm/xe/xe2_hpg: Correct implementation of Wa_16025250150")
from the drm-fixes tree and commit:
941f538b0af81 ("drm/xe: Consolidate workaround entries for Wa_16021867713")
from the drm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa.c
index 462c2fa712e01,289acac2c3c82..0000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wa.c
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-06 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 13:47 Mark Brown [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-27 20:52 linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-fixes tree Mark Brown
2026-03-27 20:46 Mark Brown
2026-03-09 14:35 Mark Brown
2026-03-06 13:47 Mark Brown
2026-01-30 15:37 Mark Brown
2026-01-30 15:28 Mark Brown
2026-01-23 17:45 Mark Brown
2025-06-27 2:58 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-18 1:56 Stephen Rothwell
2024-06-27 15:08 Mark Brown
2024-06-27 15:00 Mark Brown
2024-06-21 13:21 Mark Brown
2023-08-18 1:53 Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-13 0:23 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-26 17:49 broonie
2022-02-25 16:37 broonie
2022-02-24 16:33 broonie
2021-08-06 12:04 Mark Brown
2021-08-10 11:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-08-10 12:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-10 2:28 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-23 3:20 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-05 2:50 Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-01 2:23 Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-01 23:29 ` Alex Deucher
2019-03-04 0:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-11 12:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-14 1:51 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-07 2:38 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-07 2:31 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aara9fmCbTdROliH@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox