From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kay Sievers Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (devtmpfs) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 18:51:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20090501163405.973f9088.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <49FB1521.5050500@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.24]:4128 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754805AbZEAQwA (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2009 12:52:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49FB1521.5050500@oracle.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Greg Kroah-Hartmann On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 17:28, Randy Dunlap wrote: > drivers/base/devtmpfs.c:41: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfs_mkdir' Fixed by including fs.h. > drivers/base/devtmpfs.c:137: error: 'block_class' undeclared (first use in this function) Fixed by adding #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK. Your config seems to compile fine now here. Thanks a lot for the tests, Kay