From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: manual merge of the infiniband tree Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:50:05 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20080725134444.9e67772c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080725134444.9e67772c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:44:44 +1000") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org > Today's linux-next merge of the infiniband tree got a conflict in > include/linux/mlx4/qp.h between commit > 95d04f0735b4fc837bff9aedcc3f3efb20ddc3d1 ("IB/mlx4: Add support for > memory management extensions and local DMA L_Key") from Linus' tree and > commit 5fcbaab14db959eb6feecae57387cfff364f11b3 ("IB/mlx4: Add support > for memory management extensions and local DMA L_Key") from the > infiniband tree. > > Please don't submit patches to Linus that are different to those you have > in linux-next. Sorry, someone pointed out a bug in the patch just before I sent it to Linus. I've updated my tree to Linus's, so this conflict should be gone tomorrow. Thanks, Roland