From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure in final build
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 11:46:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae09fc06-ce41-424f-9643-5051f6256fdb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alUWw0b334Y1AiRa@sirena.org.uk>
On 7/13/26 9:48 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the kthread tree, today's linux-next build
> (powerpc pseries_le_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: modpost: "nvme_fc_rescan_remoteport" [drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "nvme_fc_unregister_remoteport" [drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "nvme_fc_unregister_localport" [drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "nvme_fc_register_remoteport" [drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "nvme_fc_register_localport" [drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit
>
> ddbcf78e8d230 (scsi: ibmvfc: Process NVMe/FC rports in work thread)
>
> I have used the version from next-20260710 instead (equivalent to
> dropping the tree since everything seems to be new today).
This is from the NVMf ibmvfc patch series. I've asked Martin to drop it from
scsi-staging as I already had a respin in process to send out, plus I clearly
forgot to gate the NVMf functionality on NVMf support being configured.
-Tyrel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-13 16:48 linux-next: build failure in final build Mark Brown
2026-07-13 18:46 ` Tyrel Datwyler [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-02 18:26 Mark Brown
2026-07-03 5:04 ` Kir Chou
2026-06-15 14:43 Mark Brown
2026-06-15 16:21 ` Mark Brown
2026-05-18 16:21 Mark Brown
2026-05-18 19:24 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-05-18 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-04-01 14:07 Mark Brown
2026-03-27 22:01 Mark Brown
2026-03-27 22:03 ` Mark Brown
2026-03-27 22:05 ` Mark Brown
2026-03-28 2:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-26 16:04 Mark Brown
2026-03-26 17:05 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-19 22:30 Mark Brown
2026-01-19 22:37 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-19 23:32 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-19 22:49 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-20 8:36 ` Alice Ryhl
2026-01-20 10:01 ` Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae09fc06-ce41-424f-9643-5051f6256fdb@linux.ibm.com \
--to=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox