From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B742305669; Wed, 24 Jun 2026 13:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782306327; cv=none; b=YGqZePr7c9xPWvkHk2e+ybtnu0QkXU3pLRSY5zFJZ0k7OaOCDNJP0jnpodtUiBV9xJGwHffrcYbpcsJDgMFCmsr/KLanbbHjIhMoVtpdW+POqXBD7k0CgLk3kzta1UfWu91sM8gwVkYmNKL0Bv/Y+4yDgEqoAr04pd/yGBZdXKM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782306327; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Snk/x1nv2FPq0m932A9AXckOLuUClhhhoRK1uU+BAlA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XtqwgM9QlzxmKl0INK9V676/qh8p+u27lQhGCOVcbapRtm5ETYWxOSwVrKgc8cawXuTNaPJ29hL8seY9S02F/PKdmAL143afcCk7ECoGBeBJgnhG1H7GGKCBIZlEG9Te+ukoQ6E4WV343zbHPdTqSyS+/rrPJEVj5qzzEayZPVE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ROArb+/6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ROArb+/6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B2B71F000E9; Wed, 24 Jun 2026 13:05:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782306326; bh=U6cefkX9RiIJObun+KV2R1ffjJXBkgp8y5WcUhapkf4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ROArb+/6/5zFuPtxVNWEJXWd5S7MY906C/jmkf2u8x+J0+GYM9MCX0vdsRLliNFet E58Um+TEWIriy4nqEmqE9Rt4NE7fUBYIWkH0HsYal1xtQHgis+HxtCzCwQr+Dwk8cr +FQyYXkEQ7KR3X3/GRR2/SdtmXEncLkh2bS+JydmveZwQF5RRpKU0eX/V4Wkr0znh9 dxn5a3dQ9R+onIcIEoNfAaACUbOoTXOaFTm13cqSJGW8a9QxsjTjM3k7YXn7jnEUOm 3eSo+mVYbk/fLV+XxFJwrtnqfPJp09JnTw+8mXySkSZ++oEmJ8ZPxe6/4qYd9XfeND rgwo46m6vJtpg== Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 14:05:21 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , Marc Zyngier , Arnd Bergmann , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm64 tree Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 12:58:03PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the arm64 tree, today's linux-next build > (arm64 kselftest) failed like this: > > CC iommufd_fail_nth > CC iommufd > CC msgque > CC ir_loopback > CC kcmp_test > CC harness-selftest > In file included from /usr/include/aarch64-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:30, > from /usr/include/signal.h:301, > from include/test_util.h:12, > from lib/io.c:8: > /tmp/next/arm64_kselftest/usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:81:9: error: > unknown type name '__u128'; did you mean '__u32'? > 81 | __u128 vregs[32]; > | ^~~~~~ __u32 > cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option > '-Wno-gnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end' may have been intended > to silence earlier diagnostics make[1]: *** [Makefile.kvm:347: > /tmp/next/arm64_kselftest/kselftest/kvm/lib/io.o] Error 1 make[1]: Thanks, Mark. I also got a similar report from test robot [1], so I'll just drop this change until I've figured out the root cause. Will [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/202606240441.7eZ1TIRM-lkp@intel.com