From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>, Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
Vivian Wang <wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the risc-v tree with the mm-unstable tree
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 15:51:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akZ6-GmTaAw-zmSC@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1363 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the risc-v tree got a conflict in:
arch/riscv/Kconfig
between commit:
115682bd57b5e ("mm: rename ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION to ARCH_SUPPORTS_PMD_SOFTLEAF")
from the mm-unstable tree and commit:
798246e5edfb3 ("riscv: acpi: Enable ARCH_HAS_ACPI_TABLE_UPGRADE")
from the risc-v tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
diff --cc arch/riscv/Kconfig
index a092fc085ecd0,cb3d85abf595a..0000000000000
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@@ -22,7 -22,8 +22,8 @@@ config RISC
select ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION if HUGETLB_PAGE && MIGRATION
select ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG if SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
select ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK if PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2
- select ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION if TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
+ select ARCH_SUPPORTS_PMD_SOFTLEAF if TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
+ select ARCH_HAS_ACPI_TABLE_UPGRADE if ACPI
select ARCH_HAS_BINFMT_FLAT
select ARCH_HAS_CC_CAN_LINK
select ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 14:51 Mark Brown [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-27 23:27 linux-next: manual merge of the risc-v tree with the mm-unstable tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-28 18:24 ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-24 1:05 Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-25 9:12 ` Paul Walmsley
2025-11-25 17:40 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akZ6-GmTaAw-zmSC@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox