From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:19:23 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: References: <20140901230728.GM29327@sirena.org.uk> <1627064.QhxvejlWdk@amdc1032> <20140904171123.GD26364@mtj.dyndns.org> <20140909003729.GA11706@mtj.dyndns.org> <20140910150447.GV30828@titan.lakedaemon.net> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.80]:40510 "EHLO qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750956AbaIJQT0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:19:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140910150447.GV30828@titan.lakedaemon.net> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jason Cooper Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Tejun Heo , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Mark Brown , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, Russell King , Kyungmin Park On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Jason Cooper wrote: > > Thanks Chris. I'm a bit behind on irqchip stuff, so I may have missed > something here... Did we get Cc'd on the original patch that caused the > regression? I'm fairly certain I haven't seen it to Ack it. This is a trivial fix to the original patch in linux-next that introduced a bug by dropping one level of indirection.