From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 28 (arch/x86/mm/kaiser.c) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:08:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <20171128145247.21f5e888@canb.auug.org.au> <7e969f86-1208-e5ea-3ee3-b9f9c73c3285@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:34709 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752311AbdK1RIk (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:08:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <7e969f86-1208-e5ea-3ee3-b9f9c73c3285@infradead.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , X86 ML , Dave Hansen On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 11/27/2017 07:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20171127: > > > > New trees: ntb, kvm-master, at24 > > > > > on x86_64: > > ../arch/x86/mm/kaiser.c: In function 'kaiser_shadow_pagetable_walk': > ../arch/x86/mm/kaiser.c:173:28: error: '__GFP_NOTRACK' undeclared (first use in this function) > gfp_t gfp = (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOTRACK | __GFP_ZERO); Yes, we need to remove that before merging it into next. The branch is still based on something which has notrack for various reasons. Thanks, tglx