From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: drivers/x86 (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 28 (misc/tc1100)) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:50:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20081128213620.2ec593d4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4930307C.30106@oracle.com> <20081129083550.3c23af37.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.1]:45932 "EHLO vms173001pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752529AbYK1VvN (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:51:13 -0500 In-reply-to: <20081129083550.3c23af37.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Len Brown , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Randy Dunlap , x86@kernel.org On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On, moved to drivers/x86/. Someone needs to clean up drivers/misc/Makefile. > > Just wondering where the move to drivers/x86 was discussed, (reviewed and > tested) and why the change is in the acpi tree and not the x86 tree? > > I am not saying it should not be done (I haven't looked enough to have an > opinion). Although I discussed it with Linus last week in Portland, it is true that this patch erroneously appeared in my tree before being sent to the list. I guess I got interrupted... I'll send it now, thanks for the note. -Len